![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Even if it becomes the second largest navy in the world I don't see Russia ever challenging America in numerical or capability terms
![]() I doubt they'll have the resources or infrastructure to maintain six carriers. If they do, it will probably be at the expense of a fair old number of subs ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Cambridgeshire - UK
Posts: 1,128
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
What is the point? Russia has nothing to gain by projecting its power abroad. Aye, prehaps it could do with a few more ships. But the millions, perhaps billions could be better spent improving the living conditions of every day Russians, and generally improving the country as a whole. When will the russians learn that a large military doesn't get it respect world wide, infact seems to make them frowned upon because the government is so militaristic in its ways.
__________________
![]() _______________________________________________ System Spec: Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz | 4Gb Corsair XMS2 Dominator DDR2 PC-2 6400 RAM | XFX GeForce 8800GTS 640mb PCI-E | Creative X-fi sound card | 250Gb HDD | Rest In Peace Dave, you will be missed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 291
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
So Russia will build new carriers for China and India? Hmmm
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Cold War Boomer
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Midwest - USA
Posts: 1,057
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() "He said the navy's core would consist of the newest strategic nuclear-powered submarines and six squadrons of aircraft carriers." I just don't see this given the current state, or likely future state, of Russia's economy. Having said that, who was the guy that said 'Russia is newer as strong, or as weak, as it appears.' |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sub Test Pilot
|
![]()
Well russia plans just two of them so it wouldnt be anything hugely massive scale like americas 15 carriers it would be for defence, bear in mind they only have one right now britian has two so for a former super power and also the 2nd largest navy on earth two it really pittiful.
Russian navy has been really a submarine navy since cold war and emphasis has always been on submarines then surface conbattantes.
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond ![]() ![]() ![]() Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,966
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
It's going to cost them large amount to build them and even more to run them and the escorts that they will require. this can only be funded if oil and gas hold up and they don't run out of both. There will also be a crunch in the near futer with the shrinking population, which is going older, not being able to man the vessal poperly with skilled crews.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|