New Speed Estimation Procedure for 1.3

jdkbph · 07-10-07, 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeFF

It's really quite simple:

1...
2....
Etc...

Please please please tell me that you can lower the periscope between the two observations and still get this to work as advertised?

TIA

JD

07-10-07, 07:59 AM

@jdkbph

Good question, given that the target becomes "unrecognised" once the scope is lowered then my gut feeling is no, it will not work if you lower and re-raise the periscope. Should though really and wouldn't be difficult to implement if the game cached last locked target.

Anyone ?

elanaiba · 07-10-07, 08:30 AM

It works even if there's no actual target, just random data inserted. So yeah, you can lower the scope.

mookiemookie · 07-10-07, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uber Gruber

@jdkbph

Good question, given that the target becomes "unrecognised" once the scope is lowered then my gut feeling is no, it will not work if you lower and re-raise the periscope. Should though really and wouldn't be difficult to implement if the game cached last locked target.

Anyone ?

I was lowering my periscope between range/bearing readings and had no problem with the speed function.

07-10-07, 08:47 AM

Quote:

It works even if there's no actual target, just random data inserted. So yeah, you can lower the scope.

Well that's great news

07-10-07, 08:30 AM	#3
elanaiba Ace of the Deep Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bucharest, Romania Posts: 1,058 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 3	It works even if there's no actual target, just random data inserted. So yeah, you can lower the scope. __________________ With strength I burn...

07-10-07, 07:59 AM	#2
Uber Gruber Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	@jdkbph Good question, given that the target becomes "unrecognised" once the scope is lowered then my gut feeling is no, it will not work if you lower and re-raise the periscope. Should though really and wouldn't be difficult to implement if the game cached last locked target. Anyone ?