![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Watch
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 30
Downloads: 261
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loader
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 82
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Filling the Damage control slots is an unrealistic exploit. In real life, there would be no place for these guys to sleep...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Treading Water
Posts: 847
Downloads: 56
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Think of it as a duty station instead of a physical location. There is no place to sleep modeled anywhere on the sub. Quarters are virtual for the rest of the duty stations, why not damage control ? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Pacific Aces Dev Team
![]() Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 1,079
Downloads: 6
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I have had systems damaged and then repaired with NO crew in the damage
control slots at all?? Not sure what that implies but maybe its just eye candy when you see crew inside the sub repairing various items. (have seen them turning wrenches and plugging leaks)... JIM
__________________
If you\'re not taking losses, you\'re not doing enough. RAdm. Kelly Turner, USN ********************************** www.fairtax.org |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: New Port Richey, Fl, USA
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Sometimes you can force them to sleep sooner than they normally would. But usually I don't bother with it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
Grey Wolf
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Treading Water
Posts: 847
Downloads: 56
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I understand that it upsets some that they do nothing else, but remember the whole thing is a very simple virtualization of how jobs get done. It's not like every task on the sub is accounted for here or that it takes exactly so many people to keep that diesel humming... If it makes you feel better, I leave 6 of my torp room slots empty and pull folks off DC duty to reload fish. I understand what you are saying, but getting the job done here does not mirror reality and I dont get hung up on it. Its more important to have the DC crew assigned for fast reaction than the torpedo room full. I will lose the 30 seconds on reloads, but 30 seconds on DC can be a disaster. Which would a captain give priority to ? Would the DC party balk at leaving their "day jobs" when there is damage ? This is a GAME issue that you play through. The SIM issue is that the sim falls short of reality with duty assignments, why should I let that impose stupid priorities on my game decisions ? DC is high priority. Why would I roleplay not assigning anyone to DC and placing my ship and crew in mortal danger ? Essientially that is what you do if you declare this an exploit. So accept and mitigate the imposed limitations or call it an exploit as it suits you, but this really makes me laugh. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deep River, CT
Posts: 255
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Subs then and now had a "Watch, Quarters and Station Bill" It assigned every person by name or billit a duty to perform during certain events Like battle stations Surface, Battle stations Submerged Torpedo Attack, Sea and Anchor detail, etc...
So YES having an assigned DCparty is not an exploit but rather a simple assignment. Frank ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 3,610
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 5
|
![]()
U-Bones, I accept and understand that damage control is an essential part of the game that needs to be paid attention. My whole grief is that, in it's current form, the damage control team does nothing else on the boat. I can accept that positions like the radio operator, cooks, medical, etc., are abstracted in the background. That's fine. What I want is a simple system back like we had in SH3: when you have damage, your best men from among the crew (selected by the player before the patrol) are sent to repair damage when the damage control team is activated. Shoot, I think it'd be even better if, for instance, off-duty crew would fill in slots on the DC team, providing a quick-reaction force, if you will. When battlestations is called, they go back to their regularly assigned station. Activate the damage control team, and your pre-selected men for DC go to this station.
I just think there would be so much more flexibility with this game if crew management was implemented in a more realistic manner, instead of putting forth the image that there were dedicated damage control parties aboard every ship. Damage control is one of the key elements all new recruits learn in basic training, and SH4 should reflect that. Actually, I do like your idea of pulling guys off the torpedo stations and putting them into the damage control slots. It's a realistic way of dealing with realistic problems. Unfortunately it's just not automated at this time. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|