![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Do we need a SMDP (Standardized Mission Design Procedure) | |||
YES - would make using user created missions more usable |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 50.00% |
NO - I like my missions the way they are!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 50.00% |
DON'T CARE - I only use the UBI official missions |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#2 |
Eternal Patrol
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,398
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
After 4 came out I looked at it to try and build a fast loader but
insertion system is so different that MBFL wont or at least shouldnt work on sh4 the technique is sound enough for sh3 but MBFL is a designers tool more than a gaming tool. Maybe im not following but I dont see how MBFL plays into your post except as a sort of example of the goal as opposed to the technique. I find that sh4 loads fairly quickly on my system so I gave it low priority to research a new approach to fast loading. The system is novel I like it I guess but usually My naming conventions follow a theme of mine, Numbered missions dont sizzle like a steak commercial does. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|