Lets's learn something from SH3....

Originally Posted by Captain Krunch

Hear, hear! Far too many people are making statements regarding the quality of SH4, despite the fact that it isn't even released yet.

Oh, oh, wait a minute. "...have a feeling it's going to be a big letdown..."? "...so us modders can fix the bugs and other broken things."? Wow, have you played the game yet? Because if you haven't, then it appears that you're making some pretty far out statements yourself.

Likewise, don't you think it's a little unwise to blindly criticize a game that none of us have even played yet?

You see, these types of comments go both ways. If you want to praise or criticize SH4 based on how well it compares to SH3, at least wait until it's out and installed on your computer; before then, it's just unfounded guesses. Yet once the game is installed, then make all the positive and negative statements you want about it.

Well, what do you expect? I'm just going by Ubisoft's past track record. It's the only thing we have to go on. I think someone proclaiming that the still unreleased SH4 will be the best WW2 sub game ever is a total fanboy. And yes, there will be bugs in SH4, maybe major bugs. But maybe, just maybe the Ubisoft developers turned over a new leaf and will release SH4 almost bug free and totally finished with great gameplay. I really hope so. But I'm betting (not hoping) that SH4 will be released totally buggy and unfinished, because they will have once again focused too much on pretty graphics and not enough on gameplay and details. I really hope I'm wrong.