Ralph Nader for President

The Avon Lady · 03-03-07, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by waste gate

This man needs to run for president.

Have you been invaded by the body snatchers? :hmm:

joea · 03-03-07, 01:04 PM

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

August · 03-03-07, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

We don't have a two party system Joe. There are many political parties in the US all able to get their candidates on the ballot, it's just that only two of them have enough public support to win national elections. Third parties have affected which one them will win however.

SUBMAN1 · 03-03-07, 01:34 PM

Our founding fathers never inteded to only have two parties. You may think that more parties are present, but there is no chance of them winning. We need the occasional 3rd party to upset the agenda of the two main parties though. I don't like Nader much however.

I wish Ross Peroe could upset a think or two.

-S

August · 03-03-07, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

... but there is no chance of them winning.

Their chances of winning is based completely on their public support, not constitutional law.

SUBMAN1 · 03-03-07, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

... but there is no chance of them winning.

Their chances of winning is based completely on their public support, not constitutional law.

True, but one could argue about how public support is being manipulated.

-S

Chaotic42 · 03-03-07, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

Quote:

Originally Posted by August

Quote:

Originally Posted by SUBMAN1

... but there is no chance of them winning.

Their chances of winning is based completely on their public support, not constitutional law.

True, but one could argue about how public support is being manipulated.

-S

When it's all said and done, each person must make his or her own decision. If someone is stupid enough to vote for who they're told to vote for, they deserve whatever happens to them.

dean_acheson · 03-03-07, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

two observations:

1. Italy.

2. It's a free market, anyone can start their own party.

Shaffer4 · 03-03-07, 05:35 PM

Um... Nader.. as I recall has run in atleast the past three presidential elections...

As far has him for President?.... Hell no... Corvair Forever!!!!

Nader is the one that is Un-safe at any speed ..:rotfl:

joea · 03-03-07, 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dean_acheson

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

two observations:

1. Italy.

2. It's a free market, anyone can start their own party.

Oh wow Dean, I didn't endorse the other extreme!

I would not wish the Italian system on y'all! Now as for the free market bit sure, but as was pointed out you need the big bucks to get heard.

dean_acheson · 03-03-07, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Quote:

Originally Posted by dean_acheson

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

two observations:

1. Italy.

2. It's a free market, anyone can start their own party.

Oh wow Dean, I didn't endorse the other extreme!

I would not wish the Italian system on y'all! Now as for the free market bit sure, but as was pointed out you need the big bucks to get heard.

lol! Sorry, that was a bit harsh, wasn't it.
I am not a fan of the way money drives things, but I am much less a fan or restrictions on free speech. McCain/Feingold is a step in the wrong direction in my book.

nikimcbee · 03-04-07, 02:17 AM

Wow, I met him when I was in high school.

dean_acheson · 03-04-07, 12:07 PM

who?

03-03-07, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joea

Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

This link will take you to a list of political parties in the US. More than you probably thought.

http://www.politics1.com/parties.htm

CCIP · 03-03-07, 06:31 PM

Existence of other parties doesn't really make it a multi-party system. The US system is by and large set up to be a two-party system and it works as such; a comparison/contrast would be Canada which is also technially set up as a two-party system but has not worked as such for many years, ironically enough.

As far as free market - indeed! Consider who holds the power: the ones with the fat party coffers. Anyone can run a party, except noone but two can actually afford to, and the system will skew results towards them and inherently disfavour anything outside of them. Net result: people off the edge of the two parties (like myself) - however many of them there may be (and often these are substantial minorities) - end up completely unrepresented in government, and disillusiond with the system as such. Democracy at its finest

03-03-07, 01:34 PM	#4
SUBMAN1 Rear Admiral Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 11,866 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Our founding fathers never inteded to only have two parties. You may think that more parties are present, but there is no chance of them winning. We need the occasional 3rd party to upset the agenda of the two main parties though. I don't like Nader much however. I wish Ross Peroe could upset a think or two. -S __________________

03-03-07, 05:35 PM	#9
Shaffer4 Ensign Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Walla Walla, Wa Posts: 223 Downloads: 3 Uploads: 0	Um... Nader.. as I recall has run in atleast the past three presidential elections... As far has him for President?.... Hell no... Corvair Forever!!!! Nader is the one that is Un-safe at any speed ..:rotfl: __________________

03-04-07, 02:17 AM	#12
nikimcbee Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Patroling the Slot. Posts: 17,952 Downloads: 90 Uploads: 0	Wow, I met him when I was in high school. __________________

03-03-07, 06:31 PM	#15
CCIP Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Waterloo, Canada Posts: 8,700 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 2	Existence of other parties doesn't really make it a multi-party system. The US system is by and large set up to be a two-party system and it works as such; a comparison/contrast would be Canada which is also technially set up as a two-party system but has not worked as such for many years, ironically enough. As far as free market - indeed! Consider who holds the power: the ones with the fat party coffers. Anyone can run a party, except noone but two can actually afford to, and the system will skew results towards them and inherently disfavour anything outside of them. Net result: people off the edge of the two parties (like myself) - however many of them there may be (and often these are substantial minorities) - end up completely unrepresented in government, and disillusiond with the system as such. Democracy at its finest __________________ There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers. -Don Van Vliet (aka Captain Beefheart)

03-03-07, 01:04 PM	#2
joea Silent Hunter Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: At periscope depth in Lake Geneva Posts: 3,512 Downloads: 25 Uploads: 0	Why is the U.S. so set on a two party system? Mind I'm not saying I think Nader is a good alternative.

03-04-07, 12:07 PM	#13
dean_acheson Ace of the Deep Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Midwest - USA Posts: 1,057 Downloads: 42 Uploads: 0	who?