SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: Which do you like more
Virginia SSN 15 53.57%
Seawolf SSN 13 46.43%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-07, 10:52 PM   #1
JSLTIGER
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Parkland, FL, USA
Posts: 1,437
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

I gotta go Seawolf on this one...
__________________
Thor:
Intel Core i7 4770K|ASUS Z87Pro|32GB DDR3 RAM|11GB EVGA GeForce RTX 2080Ti Black|256GB Crucial M4 SSD+2TB WD HDD|4X LG BD-RE|32" Acer Predator Z321QU 165Hz G-Sync (2540x1440)|Logitech Z-323 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Pro

Explorer (MSI GL63 8RE-629 Laptop):
Intel Core i7 8750H|16GB DDR4 RAM|6GB GeForce GTX 1060|128GB SSD+1TB HDD|15.6" Widescreen (1920x1080)|Logitech R-20 2.1 Sound|Win 10 Home
JSLTIGER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-07, 12:18 AM   #2
geetrue
Cold War Boomer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Walla Walla
Posts: 2,837
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

I would take either one, but I want to take her for a spin first.

The Virginia is the first of a new class of attack submarine.

Home port is Groton, Conn my son was born in New London.
I and my family spent three years in Navy housing in Groton.
The Virginia is the best of the best ...


USS Virginia SSN-774
Length 377’
Beam 34’
Displacement 7,835 tons
4 21” tubes
12 vertical tubes
Tomahawk cruise missiles
Mk 48 advanced torpedo’s
Mk 60 captor mines advanced mobile mines
Unmanned Underwater Vehicle’s
132 officer’s and men


Artist rendition of what she might look like under water

__________________
geetrue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-07, 01:12 AM   #3
Lurchi
Planesman
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Posts: 181
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
Default

What always interested me while comparing the Seawolf with the Virginia:

Does anyone know why they went back to the armament concept of the 688(I), 4 Torpedo Tubes + VLS? Costs?
Lurchi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-07, 08:02 AM   #4
Takeda Shingen
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,643
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lurchi
What always interested me while comparing the Seawolf with the Virginia:

Does anyone know why they went back to the armament concept of the 688(I), 4 Torpedo Tubes + VLS? Costs?
This is an increase in available loaded ordnance at any given time. You can have anti-surface/anti-ship missiles loaded and ready to use while keeping your 533 mm tubes reserved for ADCAPs. It all comes down to the new requirements for military platforms engaging multiple targets simultaneously; no different than the F22.
Takeda Shingen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.