![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Which do you like more | |||
Virginia SSN |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
15 | 53.57% |
Seawolf SSN |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 46.43% |
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I like the Seawolf better. 8 tubes, 50 weapons (or 100 mines). The quietiest nuclear sub in the world. Very fast. Very advanced Sonar.
The Seawolf is quieter than the Virginia. Although the Virginia has the firepower boost of VLS tubes, It is said to be designed for littoral operations and SOF insertions, not for killing the super-quiet SSK's.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Torpedoman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 119
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Check out http://subsimulations.informe.com/ Its a great ASWnut101's Great new forum site |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Can you expand a little on 'better design'?
I'm not sure if I follow; I think they're different designs. Certainly I've always been more impressed by Seawolf's reported quieting and performance than Virginia's. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Torpedoman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 119
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Ok, im basing this design thing off of what the navy says. They say that the virginia can acheive seawolf level quieting and from my opinion the new fly by wire sort of thing and the new control center or "control room" design has been over all improved. Also it is newer so i am thinking that the sonar technology is better in this class of sub too.
__________________
Check out http://subsimulations.informe.com/ Its a great ASWnut101's Great new forum site |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
"what the navy says" is a gross understatement of the boat's real capabilities.
![]() EDIT: Here's some Virginia pics (first) and Seawolf pics (second) VA concept: ![]() VA 3D drawings: ![]() Seawolf: ![]() ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
The Old Man
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,658
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Well, seeing how the real sub-skippers won't tell us these things, we can only guess.
![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Torpedoman
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest, United States
Posts: 119
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Check out http://subsimulations.informe.com/ Its a great ASWnut101's Great new forum site |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Admiral
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,021
Downloads: 9
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
you can get alot of info off the F.A.S. website.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|