SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-07, 09:35 PM   #31
Puster Bill
Grey Wolf
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: BA8758, or FN33eh for my fellow hams.
Posts: 833
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by firepower41
Quote:
Originally Posted by melnibonian
Quote:
Originally Posted by firepower41
Is it possible to raid harbors in unmodded SH3?
Nope. Almost every harbour is empty. I think NY might have some ships but I don't really remember.
As a minor historical point of interest, isn't the problem with sinking them in harbor that they can be raised and eventually repaired? How does that fit into Doenitzes tonnagewar? Should one prefer to sink them outside the harbor where they cannot be dredged, or do the enemy use more resources raising the hull etc. from the harbor than they would fabricating the ship from new parts?

I honestly don't know enough about shipbuilding etc. in those days for an answer, but I do know some sunken BBs from Pearl Harbor were raised to fight, as well as the Graf Zeppelin aircraft carrier, which the Soviets raised and refloated in 1946.
In a certain sense, every resource used in fixing up a ship that was damaged/sunk in a harbor isn't available for other uses (like building more ships). Also, some ships just aren't worth salvaging. If you break a ship in two, as opposed to just putting a hole in it, you aren't going to be able to put her back together (I suppose it is *POSSIBLE*, but I would bet the expense isn't worth it). Also, some ships are just too old to justify the expense, even in wartime when the enemy is desperate for hulls.

Think of it this way: If you sink a ship in a harbor, that is X number of tons of cargo that isn't going to be shipped to it's destination for the amount of time that ship is being repaired, which generally runs into months. In addition, if the ship was laden with cargo at the time you sank it, that cargo might be ruined (ie., if it was foodstuffs, textiles, gunpowder, gasoline/oil, etc.). So it can be worth it to sink them in the harbor, especially if you haven't had much luck elsewhere.

I figure that sinking a ship that will likely be raised and put back into service is like sinking half a ship. It isn't as good as putting one down 'over 1,000 meters', but it is better than not sinking one at all.
__________________
The U-Boat Commander of Love
Puster Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-07, 04:47 AM   #32
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,561
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducimus
Here's a spec comparision i did awhile ago.
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...34&postcount=1

Very similar.
Very handy Ducimus danke
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.