![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Let's get ready to rumble!
![]() Which was the better weapon of war, the Gato or the VIIC?
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Apples and oranges my friend, apples and oranges.
A Gato would be as ill-suited to the North Atlantic fighting as the VII (or even a IXB/C) to the Pacific theater. I'll pull out some figures shortly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Gato Class
Displacement: 1526 tons surfaced, 2424 tons submerged Crew: 80 – 85 officers and men Test depth: 300ft (91.4m) Speed: 20.25 kt (37.5 km/h) surfaced, 8.75 kt (16 km/h) submerged Torpedo tubes: 6 bow, 4 stern (24 torpedoes) Deck Gun: 102 mm/50 Range: surfaced 21,900 km at 10 knots (19 km/h), submerged 185km at 3 knots Max depth: ? Type VIIC Displacement: surfaced 769 tons, submerged 871 tons Crew: 42-46 officers and men Test depth: 90m Speed: surfaced 17 kt (31 km/h), submerged 8 kt (15 km/h) Torpedo tubes: 4 bow, 1 stern (14 torpedoes) Deck gun: 88 mm/45 Range: surfaced 11,470 km at 10 knots (19 km/h), submerged 175 km at 4 knots Max depth: 220 m (722 ft) Hard to compare two boats one of which is about 3 times larger than the other, and with a totally different design doctrine behind it :hmm: |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Yea its A&O. But If you want to go by stats
#of fish, Gato Range, Gato Technolgy, Gato Diveing depth, VIIC. Efectivenes aganst fleet, Gato But the subs where construcetd for diffrent TOs. So you cant realy compare them.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Eternal Patrol
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Speed, Gato Habitability, Gato Sonar profile, VIIC Me, I'm still in love with the laundry facility, shower and ice cream machine. And steaks.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.” —Rocky Russo |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Though I would chalk up the VIIC for the tighter turn radius, quicker dive time, and (possibly) a somewhat more damage-resistant build. There were also several technology pieces like hydrophones and attack periscope in it that the British/Americans were impressed by when they captured German boats. A Type IXD/2 is possibly the only German boat that's really worth the comparison. In which case it's still unclear - though the IXD/2 was possibly a deeper diver and definitely had better range than the Gato, it was probably a far less effective long-range raider due to a huge advantage that American boats had in terms of radar. (and their higher speed and heavier armament didn't hurt) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,691
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I agree. Considering the size and number of eels of the gato, the IX is a much better comparison.
If it's merely a case of which ones I like better, the German boats win hands down. But then I haven't got to know the US boats yet. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne FL
Posts: 6
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,177
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
If I had to choose to skipper one, I'd take that superior German engineering in a heartbeat! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 1,691
Downloads: 41
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,177
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
lol, I believe we established it was linoleum.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Weps
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 355
Downloads: 33
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
You can't compaire the two, GATO=
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
It denos't mtater waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, it's olny iprmoatnt taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae.The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelms.Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Swabbie
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bridgeport, CT, USA
Posts: 14
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
US Boat = Fish Just keepin' it real, dawg... ![]() Russ ![]()
__________________
** ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,778
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Thanks guys, that's all info I didn't know, and the comparison has helped me see both boats differently.
Weren't the VIICs pretty much built just for war and nothing else? What I mean is, there were very little comforts on the VIICs, they were war vessels, period, and not meant to serve in the fleet a really long time. Isn't that right?
__________________
"You will take on England wherever you find her ships, and you will break her power at sea." --Iron Coffins, Herbert A. Werner http://kennethmarkhoover.com |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]() Quote:
That said, I think there again is the difference in philosophy - American boats were built for longer fleet operations, with the comforts accounted for. Mind you, some German boats still served in various Allied navies for years after the war... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|