![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: What Should Be Done With the Stallion? (Please read post before replying!) | |||
APR-3, Straight Runner@55kts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 11.11% |
APR-3, Circle Search Pattern@55kts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 11.11% |
APR-3, Straight Runner@65+kts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 11.11% |
APR-3, Circle Search Pattern@65+kts |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 19.44% |
UGMT-1, Leave As Is Now |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
17 | 47.22% |
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The equivalence:
Mk46=UMGT-1=outdated, not useful in game Mk54=APR-2E(on Stallion)=based on near-future capability, useful in game I think it's pretty simple. The UMGT-1 is only 3kts faster than the SW, which gives it a lethal envelope of about 200 yards or less, when dropped in an optimal position, and 0 yards (completely ineffective) if dropped behind the SW. Cheers, David
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
I think in terms of realism we should leave as is. The SS-N-27 ASW is more effective and my preferred loadout. If we get into second guessing possible loadouts we could stray off into Dangerous grounds.
The Akula is pretty capable and in the right hands has no problems with a Seawolf. Probably the best thing to do is make the 53 cm a UGST as that is almost as good as an ADCAP. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
53cm already is a UGST...
Given the fact that the SS-N-27 payload's max speed is going to be reduced to 45kts, and that is has been at 55kts in error for so long with no one saying anything, I sense the opposition to this is strictly in principle and not because of any practical consideration given the state of DW and LWAMI. I have to think that 1/3 of people will oppose any changes that aren't written in Jane's (even though jane's can be wrong too) and 1/3 of people will oppose any improvements to Russian equipment, particularly SUBROCs, even if the balance of the changes will make both SUBROCs, when considered together, less effective. If I don't filter those opinions out, I'm left with a confusing picture. Cheers, David
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|