SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: What Should Be Done With the Stallion? (Please read post before replying!)
APR-3, Straight Runner@55kts 4 11.11%
APR-3, Circle Search Pattern@55kts 4 11.11%
APR-3, Straight Runner@65+kts 4 11.11%
APR-3, Circle Search Pattern@65+kts 7 19.44%
UGMT-1, Leave As Is Now 17 47.22%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-07, 05:29 PM   #1
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

The equivalence:

Mk46=UMGT-1=outdated, not useful in game

Mk54=APR-2E(on Stallion)=based on near-future capability, useful in game

I think it's pretty simple.

The UMGT-1 is only 3kts faster than the SW, which gives it a lethal envelope of about 200 yards or less, when dropped in an optimal position, and 0 yards (completely ineffective) if dropped behind the SW.

Cheers,
David
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-07, 05:38 PM   #2
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

I think in terms of realism we should leave as is. The SS-N-27 ASW is more effective and my preferred loadout. If we get into second guessing possible loadouts we could stray off into Dangerous grounds.

The Akula is pretty capable and in the right hands has no problems with a Seawolf.

Probably the best thing to do is make the 53 cm a UGST as that is almost as good as an ADCAP.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-07, 05:44 PM   #3
LuftWolf
Ocean Warrior
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
Default

53cm already is a UGST...

Given the fact that the SS-N-27 payload's max speed is going to be reduced to 45kts, and that is has been at 55kts in error for so long with no one saying anything, I sense the opposition to this is strictly in principle and not because of any practical consideration given the state of DW and LWAMI.

I have to think that 1/3 of people will oppose any changes that aren't written in Jane's (even though jane's can be wrong too) and 1/3 of people will oppose any improvements to Russian equipment, particularly SUBROCs, even if the balance of the changes will make both SUBROCs, when considered together, less effective.

If I don't filter those opinions out, I'm left with a confusing picture.

Cheers,
David
__________________
LW
LuftWolf is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.