GWX Sub range

[filefool]

Thanks for the welcome!

To answer your question:

I got SH3 when it came out but didn't play it a long time. That changed with the release of GWX and I had to dig deep to find my SH3 copy.

So I did a fresh install with patch 1.4b and installed GWX just as it was described in the manual. The only thing I have enabled with JSGME is the dec-23 patch and the type XXI hydrophone-fix.

Actually the range is pretty accurate when i am going the 10 knots which are described everywhere as being the normal cruise speed. But going 2-3 knots slower almost doubles my range.
I am not complaining on this, it just doesn't feel right (realistic) since I don't have to buy a type IX to participate in operation drumbeat.

[danlisa]

Originally Posted by filefool

Actually the range is pretty accurate when i am going the 10 knots which are described everywhere as being the normal cruise speed. But going 2-3 knots slower almost doubles my range.

I think that you might have answered your own question, partially.

Somebody might have to correct me but.....IIRC to acheive the desired realistic value of 12000km @ 10kts you actually have to put those figures in the file changes. The problem arises as SH3's engine uses 8kts as the most efficient and therefore works on the figure of 12000km @ 10kts to work out what your max distance can be @ 8kts. Alas Klar

I don't know how technically correct my explaination is however this is what I came across when editing my boats range before supermods came along.

I will mention this to the GWX dev's to see if anything can be done.

[filefool]

Originally Posted by danlisa

Somebody might have to correct me but.....IIRC to acheive the desired realistic value of 12000km @ 10kts you actually have to put those figures in the file changes. The problem arises as SH3's engine uses 8kts as the most efficient and therefore works on the figure of 12000km @ 10kts to work out what your max distance can be @ 8kts. Alas Klar

Sounds logical to me. But if the cruise speed is hardcoded at 8 kn i think there's little someone can do. Setting the maximum range to the speed that the game recognizes as the most efficient (8 kn) is equally unrealistic, because you won't get far when running at 10 kn.

I wonder... :hmm: the IXD2 has a max. range of 23700 km at 12 knots!
Think about how far you be able to go by dropping the speed about 4 kn!
You start in 1943 when it's available and you never have to come back until the war is over.

[danlisa]

Originally Posted by filefool

I wonder... :hmm: the IXD2 has a max. range of 23700 km at 12 knots!
Think about how far you be able to go by dropping the speed about 4 kn!

Drop to 10 or 8kts and you might get increased range but any lower or higher and the range will drop. 8-10 is the magic number.

[filefool]

Originally Posted by danlisa

Drop to 10 or 8kts and you might get increased range but any lower or higher and the range will drop. 8-10 is the magic number.

Oomph, missing word. I meant dropping the speed by 4 kn. From 12 to 8. That should get you at least 50000 km range with IXD2.

[AS]

What I know is that fuel consumption vaired immensly depending on whether you ran at low or high speed - it varied much more than compared to, say, a car. When there was operation Paukenschlag, Germany sent two VIIc U-Boats from France to America (U.S. coast!!!), and obviously it worked, but they had to travel very slowly, probably using one engine only. By the way: Lehmann Willenbrock was one of those guys (U-96)!!

Cheers, AS

[VipertheSniper]

Yeah about 7 knots is the most efficient speed in SH3, I guess that's why slow ahead is now only goes to 4 or 5 knots in GWX, unless you use the speedo to dial in the 7 knots manually, you don't have unrealistically long ranges. I wondered on my first patrols why on slow ahead the boat would only go 8-9000 km I think until I discovered that it wasn't running at 7 knots, like in stock SH3 anymore.

[Kpt. Lehmann]

Originally Posted by AS

....Germany sent two VIIc U-Boats from France to America (U.S. coast!!!), and obviously it worked, but they had to travel very slowly, probably using one engine only. By the way: Lehmann Willenbrock was one of those guys (U-96)!!

Cheers, AS

Good old K.Kpt Lehmann-Willenbrock. I have to say I like that guy!

[Letum]

Originally Posted by AS

What I know is that fuel consumption vaired immensly depending on whether you ran at low or high speed - it varied much more than compared to, say, a car. When there was operation Paukenschlag, Germany sent two VIIc U-Boats from France to America (U.S. coast!!!), and obviously it worked, but they had to travel very slowly, probably using one engine only. By the way: Lehmann Willenbrock was one of those guys (U-96)!!

Cheers, AS

nah, they didnt go slowly. If you go slower than 7knts you use MORE fuel.

They filled some of the ships drinking water tanks with fuel and docked with a milk cow half way there/back.