Game Play Observations of GWX after 4-5 Days

[AVGWarhawk]

Originally Posted by edjcox

When a player posts a concern his legitimacy should not be in question.

We all know that GWX made many changes to enhance realism. The positive bouyancy one is a good change. To start a mission when in close proximity to enemy vessels with your conning tower exposed is not. This immediatly alerts the DD's and other vessels to your presence and initiates AI attack and evasion tactics from the Merchants and other target vessels. Short of stupidity no Commander would get into the predicament intentionally. So GWX's team may consider starting at a concealed depth and then allowing rise and bouyancy to expose the Sub if the Commander takes no action to prevent the exposure. That is all the asker wanted..

I agree that the uboat should be started well below periscope depth in scripted missions.. If that is all the poster wanted then he should have stated thus and left it alone but....there are other statments and questions in the post that required an educated answer/response.

Just what is ment by, I want a better GWX!"? Geez, show us your receipt of purchase and we will refund your money....oh never mind, it was free. Mayhaps a thread in the mods section stating difficulty starting with the conning tower showing in scripted missions can it be fixed, possibly more appropriate?

Just my thoughts on the subject.