![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#11 | ||
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UCLA, Los Angeles
Posts: 73
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
Science itself has a VAST body of knowledge that has proven again and again to be accurate. Sure, the is a HUGE amount of things that science does not know, or can't (yet) explain, but I hardly think that that is a strike against science. Of course, theories sometimes change. As humans learn more, science generally improves, finding more and more accurate explanations for things. Indeed, a fundamental postulate of science is to never truly "believe" anything, but many things can certainly be loosely accepted as true unless some significant contradictory evidence arises. It would certainly be nice to give children all the information we have, every false theory could lead to new and correct ideas. However, that is simply impossible for anyone to learn unless you have thousands of the best hard drives in your brain for memory storage. Science class needs to be restricted to things that are accepted by, well, science. Right now, there amount of evidence for evolution and a ~4.6 billion year old Earth is simply extreme. The amount of evidence for intelligent design and a young Earth is negligible. For some laughs, look at this fundementalist Christan website (for kidz!): http://objectiveministries.org/kidz/ The atheist part is the best (scroll down a bit). Now I have to go back to being bitter and grumpy... ![]()
__________________
Neutrino 123 Last edited by Gizzmoe; 10-29-06 at 03:54 AM. Reason: Changed text color, no white text, please! |
||
![]() |
|
|