|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think about the renown system? | |||
| It's fine, leave it as it is (losing renown when upgrading) |
   
|
21 | 51.22% |
| A compromise would be good (renown is required but not lost when upgrading) |
  
|
15 | 36.59% |
| I'm a "I don't wanna pay for anything" commander |
  
|
5 | 12.20% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-22-06, 01:58 PM
|
#10 |
|
Ace of the Deep
 Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cologne, Germany
Posts: 1,227
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
|
Do you remember the game "Aces of the Deep"? You were offered a new (better) boat only if you were a really succesful commander. If you didn't think enough ships you didn't get the XXI for example. This is how SH3 should work: You only get new boats if you are succesful and have the required renown but you don't lose that renown when you get a new one!
 
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode