![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: How many tanker classes would you reasonably like to see in SHIV? | |||
1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 2.44% |
3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 4.88% |
4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 24.39% |
5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 9.76% |
5+ |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 58.54% |
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,878
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Japanese freighters especially were smaller than most freighters used in the Atlantic. Or at least, that's the impression that I have...
Quote:
![]() AOD had probably the worst warship selection of any subsim, now that I think about it. Only UK warships (except for US transfers), including only 1 fleet carrier and no CAs. ![]() SHI was actually pretty good - all Japanese BBs and almost all CV's were included (omitted - Hosho, Hiryu, Chitose class, Kaiyo, Shinyo). Plus all CAs, and most CLs (except for Katori class, Yubari, and I think Oyodo and Tenryu classes?). Good collection of DD's as well. SHII, for the most part, had a good selection. With the level of the rosters they included, they could have modeled more French and Italian vessels though. Also, the British BB selection was terrible - No KGV or Nelson classes. And although the Ark Royal was included, the carrier selection was nothing to get excited about. When SHIII came out, I really hoped that they would get it right this time but they didn't. I am mostly satisfied with the BB selection, but once again, the carrier selection was limited to one. I was also less satisfied with the cruiser selection than I have ever been with any other subsim. The one good thing about all of that though, is that the only pevious Pacific Subsim had the most complete warship collection. Not binding though... ![]() Last edited by AG124; 09-24-06 at 05:34 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
Yea, even SHIII suffered from the 'warship syndrome' - but what to be surprised about? Look at the modded ships that have mostly been released as of now, even. It seems there's simply more interest in modelling the big pretty ships than the ugly practical ships :hmm: You two (AG124 and iambecomelife) are among our few saving exceptions :p
What I might hope for is that perhaps SHIV will finally provide a more open kit for modders to implement new ships quickly. Still, let's keep all possibilities open. It may well be that even with most effort going to warships, there will still be a fair variety of simple merchants. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
The Old Man
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Id like to see some fleet tankers.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance." ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Silent Hunter
![]() Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,816
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
I think its obviouse that people will vote for 5+ tankers, given the poll options....
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|