SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

View Poll Results: How many tanker classes would you reasonably like to see in SHIV?
1 0 0%
2 1 2.44%
3 2 4.88%
4 10 24.39%
5 4 9.76%
5+ 24 58.54%
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-06, 01:20 PM   #1
AG124
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,878
Downloads: 4
Uploads: 0
Default

Japanese freighters especially were smaller than most freighters used in the Atlantic. Or at least, that's the impression that I have...

Quote:
Originally Posted by iambecomelife
One large class of Japanese Tanker should be alright for SHIV, as long as it is balanced by a greater number of much smaller tankers.IIRC there are to be 70 combat units in all for the game (air and sea). Considering all the planes and warships that need to be included, I fear we're going to end up with a small, repetitive sampling of merchant ships. AOD's over a decade old and we're still stuck with "Big Merchant, Average Merchant, Little Merchant". In fact SH3 was a step backward from AOD in that there was no tonnage randomization for generic ships.
I have the sad feeling that you are going to be right about that. Although a good warship selection will be important too - SHIII failed there as well.

AOD had probably the worst warship selection of any subsim, now that I think about it. Only UK warships (except for US transfers), including only 1 fleet carrier and no CAs.

SHI was actually pretty good - all Japanese BBs and almost all CV's were included (omitted - Hosho, Hiryu, Chitose class, Kaiyo, Shinyo). Plus all CAs, and most CLs (except for Katori class, Yubari, and I think Oyodo and Tenryu classes?). Good collection of DD's as well.

SHII, for the most part, had a good selection. With the level of the rosters they included, they could have modeled more French and Italian vessels though. Also, the British BB selection was terrible - No KGV or Nelson classes. And although the Ark Royal was included, the carrier selection was nothing to get excited about.

When SHIII came out, I really hoped that they would get it right this time but they didn't. I am mostly satisfied with the BB selection, but once again, the carrier selection was limited to one. I was also less satisfied with the cruiser selection than I have ever been with any other subsim.

The one good thing about all of that though, is that the only pevious Pacific Subsim had the most complete warship collection. Not binding though...
__________________


DOWNLOAD GWX HERE:
http://www.thegreywolves.com/index.html

Last edited by AG124; 09-24-06 at 05:34 PM.
AG124 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-06, 01:34 PM   #2
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Yea, even SHIII suffered from the 'warship syndrome' - but what to be surprised about? Look at the modded ships that have mostly been released as of now, even. It seems there's simply more interest in modelling the big pretty ships than the ugly practical ships :hmm: You two (AG124 and iambecomelife) are among our few saving exceptions :p

What I might hope for is that perhaps SHIV will finally provide a more open kit for modders to implement new ships quickly.


Still, let's keep all possibilities open. It may well be that even with most effort going to warships, there will still be a fair variety of simple merchants.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-06, 02:50 PM   #3
WilhelmSchulz.
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

Id like to see some fleet tankers.
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance."

WilhelmSchulz. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-06, 09:56 AM   #4
JU_88
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 3,816
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

I think its obviouse that people will vote for 5+ tankers, given the poll options....
JU_88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.