Proof Bush Stole the Election

[nikimcbee]

Originally Posted by Yahoshua

(Eats popcorn)

Looks like one-liners don't make much impact on the overall scale here (referring to PH).

Looks like y'all did it again. THOU HAST ACTIVATED: THE RANT!!!

Rant ON

@ SubSerpent:

I'm surprised you don't understand the importance of maintaining a standing army that would be ready for war at a moment's notice. More so after you've been in the service. We need Marines because they're crazy (read: Stupid) enough, and have enough balls to seize a beach head so the army can come onboard. Besides, we won't be getting rid of the army or Marines until the Navy boats grow legs and can take care of the job for us.

Communism may be gone in the regards to the USSR , but there are plenty of other dangers that are present. Our military needs to be kept at it's peak, especially since the Chinese are continually building and re-organizing their war machine. The price of paying a few more dollars from our wallets to maintain a clean sharp edge is less costly than a war in which we are at a disadvantage.

What I do see as a wholesale waste of our tax dollars is when beauracracy starts eating it up by making up more red tape.

Ever wonder why we still have that ancient and burdensome tape when the Pentagon can produce far more advanced weaponry, in a shorter amount of time, and accompish it under budget with a "Black Project"?

Of course the Beauracracy is more than willing to pay $400 for a hammer, or $2,000 for a toilet seat.

And god forbid that we stop international aid to nations that are in every way imaginable HOSTILE to us. (Indonesia, Pakistan, etc.).


@ nobody in particular:

I have the perfect example of rule by the Democratic party: Kommiefornia (California), just slightly less Democratic than China.

Kommiefornia has passed some of the most restrictive laws I can think of. Particularly regarding firearms and ones' right to defend oneself.

It has gotten so bad that a majority of firearm/ammunition manufacturers have STOPPED providing services to the Police Departments there and REFUSE to service their firearms or sell them firearms and ammunition.

Why? Well, lets take a look.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...type=printable

http://www.hk94.com/hk/CA-DOJ-Banned...se-t15544.html

http://www.hk94.com/hk/FIREARMS-MICR...NG-t16184.html

http://www.hk94.com/hk/AB-357-t15048.html

Currently, Glock is the ONLY firearms manufacturer that has a monopoly on sales of sidearms. Glock is considering of abandoning the Kommiefornia market with the recent bills AB-357 and AB-352 put on the list for a vote on the Senate floor. The bills are expected to pass.

Lovely, Democrats Control California, and we're disarmed and stripped of the right to defend ourselves. Sounds LOTS like Communism. It's nice when a heavily taxed state that can't even operate within their huge budget finds a way to waste even more forcibly collected funds.

But what happens when criminals start using revolvers or brass catchers? I guess they'll pass a new law to ban those too.

*UPDATE*

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=71240

Oh well. I guess the LEOs' can kiss their Glocks goodbye, cuz I guarantee you that Glock is NOT going to go through with this.

My, now Democrats have succeeded in disarming their Law Enforcement Officers.

And two new bills have been drafted and are on the waiting list to be voted on..

SB 59 which criminalizes a firearms owner if their stolen firearm is used in a crime. Also tacked onto this, is the requirement that ALL thefts of stolen firearms are reported to the authorities.

AB-2714 Bans the purchase of ammunition by California residents via the Internet.

Well, we've successfully disarmed the populace. And the Seizure of the 9th Circuit was accomplished a while ago. So what's next?

http://www.rmgo.org/Gestapo/index.shtml

Oops!! I guess it's time to REALLY bring Communism to Kommiefornia. Time to play Big Brother!! (BTW, I live in Denver so this is sounding like a REAL FUN to me).

But criminals aren't going to turn in their guns, they're CRIMINALS!! SO what's the Democratic answer?

http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/n...l/15447079.htm



The following is a short timeline up to 1994 of various "Gun Control" laws passed here in the U.S.

http://www.infoplease.com/spot/guntime1.html

These are SOME of the results of "Gun Control."

http://www.fightthebias.com/Resource...un_control.htm

Democrats don't play by the same rules as everyone else does:

Read the small blurb about her stance on "Gun Control."

http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/Dianne_Feinstein

And this one about Chuck Schumer having an ARMED bodyguard.

http://www.americandaily.com/article/9405

WHY in the world would Democrats want to advocate Gun Control?

Oh wait, Gun Control = People Control.

At least with the Republicans in charge, the masses are fully armed and capable of overthrowing a corrupt government. Btw, both Fascism and Communism called themselves SOCIALISTS and championed for the rights of the people until they took absolute control.

And while this may be ONE issue regarding Democrats, this alone is enough to get me to make an about face and go anywhere but to them. I've also seen enough in all the other issues that the Democrats take positions on (ie. Welfare, the rights of private businesses, TAXES, National Security, U.S. sovreignty being subject to the U.N. etc.) to be convinced that Democrats WILL drive the United States into the ground and we will cease to be a sovereign and independent nation. I hope you like Baby Blue....or Red Stars (both have the same goal).

If you dispute the evidence presented, I suggest you read a couple of books entitled :"The Bias Against Guns," and "More Guns: Less Crime." Both are written by John R. Lott.

Rant OFF


(Continues to eat popcorn)

Can I have some popcorn?