SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-25-06, 12:52 PM   #16
WilhelmSchulz.
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virgina Beach
Posts: 1,301
Downloads: 17
Uploads: 0
Default

The Tang I do Belive was a Balao. :hmm:
__________________
"Some ships are designed to sink… others require our assistance."

WilhelmSchulz. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-06, 05:18 PM   #17
ricnunes
Watch
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 26
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

Yeap the Balao can be considered an "updated" Gato but nevertheless I hope that they include the Balao on SH4. Note that more Balaos existed and therefore more Balaos saw action on the Pacific than the gato. It would be real bad if the devs decided to leave the Balao out of the game!
ricnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-06, 09:05 AM   #18
Hitman
Pacific Aces Dev Team
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,109
Downloads: 109
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
The Tang I do Belive was a Balao.
That's right SS-306 was already a BALAO

The Balaos were essentially improved hull-Gatos, same design, but improved hull resistance AND what was almost as important, prepared to be assembled from pre-built parts (like teh german Type XXI or the Victory/Liberty ships)

As for the conning tower, ALL US subs where it was possible received that refit during 1943, intended to have a smaller visual silhouette for night surface actions. Perchs, tambors and also salmos & sargos received that refit plus the first SJ radar and also a new repaint in grey later (At the start of the war and during the first months, US subs were all painted in very dark grey, nearly black).
__________________
One day I will return to sea ...
Hitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-06, 09:23 AM   #19
cmdrk
Planesman
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 184
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitman
As for the conning tower, ALL US subs where it was possible received that refit during 1943, intended to have a smaller visual silhouette for night surface actions. Perchs, tambors and also salmos & sargos received that refit plus the first SJ radar and also a new repaint in grey later (At the start of the war and during the first months, US subs were all painted in very dark grey, nearly black).
Wartime experience dictated changes to the sub's superstructure during refits. It seems the most common changes were cutting down the front to provide a gun platform, the "front porch". And later, removing some of the fairwater under the aft cigarette deck to reduce the silhouette.

One book speculated that with all the modifications on the superstructure at Mare Island, Pearl, Midway, etc. that no two submarines looked alike. The book showed a picture of 5 or 6 subs berthed side by side. Two of them were commissioned within months of each other from the same yard. Each one had something different about it.
cmdrk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-06, 09:54 AM   #20
AirborneTD
Engineer
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Posts: 204
Downloads: 23
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricnunes
Yeap the Balao can be considered an "updated" Gato but nevertheless I hope that they include the Balao on SH4. Note that more Balaos existed and therefore more Balaos saw action on the Pacific than the gato. It would be real bad if the devs decided to leave the Balao out of the game!
This is not quite true. Yes, there were, eventually, more Balao's than Gato's in the Pacific, but the Gatos ran more war patrols than the Balao's and Tench classes combined. The latter 2 classes came out much later when targets were becoming scarce. The Gatos bore that brunt of the fighting as well as the earlier boats.

The Balaos numbered 105 boats compared to the Gato 54 by war's end, but the Gatos ran 587 patrols to the Balao 423.
__________________
"You know, you might get surrounded." "We're paratroopers, Lieutenant. We're supposed to be surrounded." --Band of Brothers
AirborneTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-06, 03:25 PM   #21
Capt. D
Helmsman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 109
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Quote:
The Balaos numbered 105 boats compared to the Gato 54 by war's end, but the Gatos ran 587 patrols to the Balao 423.
Also, only 11 Tench class boats made any patrols in WWII. The brunt of the patrols were made by Gatos and Balaos. The USS Flasher ran up the highest score in tonnage sunk and she was a Gato class.

The Tautog, a Tambor class boat (class prior to Gatos), ran up the most ships sunk, though, with 26 confirmed sinkings. So number vs class did not matter at times.



Happy Hunting

Last edited by Capt. D; 09-02-06 at 03:27 PM.
Capt. D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-06, 10:39 AM   #22
ricnunes
Watch
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 26
Downloads: 14
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AirborneTD
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricnunes
Yeap the Balao can be considered an "updated" Gato but nevertheless I hope that they include the Balao on SH4. Note that more Balaos existed and therefore more Balaos saw action on the Pacific than the gato. It would be real bad if the devs decided to leave the Balao out of the game!
This is not quite true. Yes, there were, eventually, more Balao's than Gato's in the Pacific, but the Gatos ran more war patrols than the Balao's and Tench classes combined. The latter 2 classes came out much later when targets were becoming scarce. The Gatos bore that brunt of the fighting as well as the earlier boats.

The Balaos numbered 105 boats compared to the Gato 54 by war's end, but the Gatos ran 587 patrols to the Balao 423.
Ok, that the Gatos did more patrols than the Balaos, afterall the Gatos entered in service first and like the Balaos they were fought till the end of the war but the number of patrols of the Balao was also very big so I think that very few would disagree that the Balao shouldn't be included in SH4.

For example the German TypeXXI according to many sources never saw actual combat in WWII but nevertheless it was included in SH3 so I think not having the Balao in SH4 would be a HUGE mistake from the SH4 devs. I even think that not having the Tench in SH4 is a mistake (despite seeing limited service in WWII - But so the German TypeXXI did).
But I do hope that the Balao (and even the Tench) is included as a "variantion" of the Gato.
ricnunes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-06, 05:22 PM   #23
Hitman
Pacific Aces Dev Team
 
Hitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 6,109
Downloads: 109
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
The Gatos bore that brunt of the fighting as well as the earlier boats.
Yeah, and in fact the highest scoring submarine was .... a T class! USS Tautog (SS204??) was it.
__________________
One day I will return to sea ...
Hitman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-06, 07:11 AM   #24
Capt. D
Helmsman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 109
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
Quote:
Ok, that the Gatos did more patrols than the Balaos, afterall the Gatos entered in service first and like the Balaos they were fought till the end of the war but the number of patrols of the Balao was also very big so I think that very few would disagree that the Balao shouldn't be included in SH4.

Quote:
But I do hope that the Balao (and even the Tench) is included as a "variantion" of the Gato.
[/QUOTE]

If my memory serves me correctly - SH had all classes of boats from the S- Boat up. I believe that included the Salmon. Permit, Tambor, Gato, Balao, and Tench. I remember being given the opportunity to "transfer" to a new boat with classes of Balao and Tench so I guess why would the dev. team NOT include them in SH4? If a sim - SH "way back when" could include these boats and their individual operational "properties" - I see no reason a sim of the 21st century can not have at minimum what SH had!

Happy Hunting
Capt. D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-06, 10:44 AM   #25
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Capt. D
If a sim - SH "way back when" could include these boats and their individual operational "properties" - I see no reason a sim of the 21st century can not have at minimum what SH had!
SHI also had the Narwhal, Nautilus and Argonaut. The problem is that SHI only had to have a different 'Gauges' panel, repair view and 'Exiting the port' clip; whereas SHIV will have to have a fully detailed control room interior plus exterior shots for each class. I would love to see them all, but I'll understand if I don't.

I'm sure the Balao and Tench should be easy as derivatives of the Gato, but each of the others is a separate class.

Gotta have them 'S'-boats, though.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-06, 02:12 PM   #26
Capt. D
Helmsman
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 109
Downloads: 8
Uploads: 0
[QUOTE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sailor Steve
SHI also had the Narwhal, Nautilus and Argonaut. The problem is that SHI only had to have a different 'Gauges' panel, repair view and 'Exiting the port' clip; whereas SHIV will have to have a fully detailed control room interior plus exterior shots for each class. I would love to see them all, but I'll understand if I don't.

I'm sure the Balao and Tench should be easy as derivatives of the Gato, but each of the others is a separate class.

Gotta have them 'S'-boats, though.
Your right to a degree. Minus the V class you mention though, Gatos thru Tench had very very little in the way of different detail in the control room or conning tower (we need the conning tower as it was the 'control center' of the attack) or for that matter any of the compartments. Some different arrangments of where some equipment may have been placed but otherwise not much that one would be upset about if not just exact. Exterior wise should not be an issue if the "Birds eye view" of SH3 and SH2 are not kept. One never had that view anyway. Same with "under water" views. If I had to do without those would be my choice.

T-class were very close to the Gatos + also. the Ps, Salmon class may have been the most different from the other 'fleet boats' but still should not have been that much. They may have had one scope accesable from the control room rather than both in the conning tower and only one engine room rather than the two of the later classes. (I do not believe we will have entrior shots of the torp rooms so 4 or 6 forward or 2 or 4 aft should not be that much at all other than adding to whatever we are given for firing controls.) The S-Boats on the other hand had the most difference and would take the most time to develope intrior graphics vs the others, but yes should be included.

I still think it can be accomplished without to much trouble if we keep the Gatos+ differences to a bare minimum and Ts are very close that they could in fact get away with almost the same shots. The Ps and Salmons would need more of a change and of course the S-Boats so maybe just three different views?

We'll see what the finished product is. Can wish though!

Happy Hunting
Capt. D is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.