SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-14-25, 10:50 AM   #16
Eichhörnchen
Starte das Auto
 
Eichhörnchen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: The Fens
Posts: 17,488
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default Portugal drops the F35

https://theaviationist.com/2025/03/1...al-f-35-plans/

There's going to be no autonomy when operating these - if they can be switched off at the precocious whim of a man-child, who's going to want them?
__________________
Eichhörnchen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-25, 10:54 AM   #17
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,168
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

Good point but try telling that to Two Tier Keir.
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-25, 11:14 AM   #18
mapuc
CINC Pacific Fleet
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 20,590
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

No doubt the Swedish fighter jet is a better choice



Markus
__________________

My little lovely female cat
mapuc is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 08:19 AM   #19
Dargo
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,730
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

After Portugal, Canada now wants to get rid of US F-35 fighter jets. Canadian Defence Minister Bill Blair announced a few hours after his reappointment to Prime Minister Mark Carney's new cabinet that the country is looking for other options. Canada has an order outstanding for F-35s worth some $19 billion. A majority of Canadians want to get rid of this, as the southern neighbour has proved to be a highly unreliable partner. In total, Canada has ordered 88 fighter jets, 16 of which have already been paid for. According to Blair, Canada is now looking at supplementing the rest of the fleet with aircraft of European make, such as the Swedish Saab Gripen. On Friday, Portugal preceded Canada in saying it no longer wants the F35, formerly known as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). Portugal's defence minister gave the unpredictable behaviour of US President Trump as the reason.
__________________
Salute Dargo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
A victorious Destroyer is like a ton against an ounce.
Dargo is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 08:38 AM   #20
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,168
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I suspect others will follow but that begs the question, Does Two Tier Keir have the balls to fo;;ow as well?
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 08:43 AM   #21
Dargo
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,730
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

The Dutch will not follow, but then we are too much involved in this aircraft economical and basically a US air force in Europe.
__________________
Salute Dargo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
A victorious Destroyer is like a ton against an ounce.
Dargo is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 09:14 AM   #22
Dargo
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,730
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

Türkiye’s bid to acquire Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jets is advancing steadily, with the United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defence officially submitting a sales proposal to Türkiye’s Ministry of National Defence. According to Turkish media reports citing sources, Türkiye’s defence ministry is now conducting a thorough review of the sales offer, a critical step in the procurement process. “We previously announced that an official document had been prepared regarding the acquisition of 40 Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jets to meet the operational demands of our air force. This document was submitted to the UK Ministry of Defence and the relevant manufacturer, with the expectation of receiving a counteroffer,” a source told Turkish media. “The anticipated offer has now reached our ministry, and the evaluation process is currently underway.” https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/t...-formal-offer/
__________________
Salute Dargo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
A victorious Destroyer is like a ton against an ounce.
Dargo is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 09:19 AM   #23
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 191,168
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 13


Default

I'm sure we could dig up a few Spitfires if they want a wider choice
__________________
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools because they have to say something.
Oh my God, not again!!

Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 09:37 AM   #24
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,109
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna View Post
Should never have retired the Spitfire
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbuna View Post
I'm sure we could dig up a few Spitfires if they want a wider choice
I'm in favor of Sopwith Camels myself....the overall 'wonder weapon' mentality(ala Hitler) against its cost and maintenance, incl. serious downtime as both a carrier and landbased aircraft guaranteed to achieve air supremacy in the coming WW III's two-front war against Russia and China causes me serious concern$.
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 10:07 AM   #25
Ostfriese
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern Germany
Posts: 1,888
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aktungbby View Post
I'm in favor of Sopwith Camels myself....the overall 'wonder weapon' mentality(ala Hitler) against its cost and maintenance, incl. serious downtime as both a carrier and landbased aircraft guaranteed to achieve air supremacy in the coming WW III's two-front war against Russia and China causes me serious concern$.

I guess Sopwith Camels would be somewhat difficult to spot these days. They are small, have few metallic parts and a low power engine, both of which would make it surprisingly difficult to detect them on radar or on infrared. They are also quite slow, which would make them difficult to shoot at from a fast aircraft. And they fly at a relatively low altitude. They'd be an easy prey for ground based air defence, though, and they can only carry a small payload (but more than SpaceX's Starship!)
Ostfriese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 10:08 AM   #26
mapuc
CINC Pacific Fleet
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 20,590
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Can't find anything on Denmarks plan on buying this F 35 If they have changed their mind or so. So far they have got 10 of them.

Looks like they are both blind and deaf or in deep love with this fighter jet.

Markus
__________________

My little lovely female cat
mapuc is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 10:16 AM   #27
Buddahaid
Shark above Space Chicken
 
Buddahaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 9,333
Downloads: 162
Uploads: 0


Default

As much as I hate to admit it, at this juncture with the current US administration, it would benefit all NATO members to look for another EU based platform.
__________________
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/4962/oeBHq3.jpg
"However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light."
Stanley Kubrick

"Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming."
David Bowie
Buddahaid is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 10:20 AM   #28
Dargo
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,730
Downloads: 21
Uploads: 0
Default

We already have that choice with several European companies that all are build with NATO integration. Like with other equipment, they all can be used jointly because they all are build with NATO standardization.
__________________
Salute Dargo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Tzu
A victorious Destroyer is like a ton against an ounce.
Dargo is online   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-25, 11:05 AM   #29
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,109
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Icon9 "Alles kaput!"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ostfriese View Post
They'd be an easy prey for ground based air defence, though, and they can only carry a small payload (but more than SpaceX's Starship!)
...as the twin Spandau'd Ace of Aces Baron found out the hard way chasing one Sopwiith Camel with another on his 'six'; only to "buy the farm" laterally from a Lewis gunner on the ground near a beetfield....
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-25, 09:53 AM   #30
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 17,816
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buddahaid View Post
As much as I hate to admit it, at this juncture with the current US administration, it would benefit all NATO members to look for another EU based platform.
Yes, but Europe needs fighters in numbers now, not in 20+ years.

Also, as i heard the F35 electronic systems can be replaced, as a friend of mine working said "it is not that complicated, and we are quite good at it (...just like Israel)".
__________________


>^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong.
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.