Do we have a cooking thread?

[Skybird]

I believe everz word zou say. Its just that I currentlz test for 30 days what is officiallz named carnivor diet, and that is in priciple a n carbs and animal origin diet, and an eliminationdiet. so my beloved Magic Dust, whcih is my preferred rub, and French fries are off limits .


Its day 5 today, and I wonder whether you can form an addiction to beef. So far I love it and can imagine to stay with it, just getting steaks abd patties is a bit difficult in supermarkets, its scaring to what degree some of the have turned vegan and anti/meat. well, needing to stalk for such offers replaces the ancient hunt in the jungle, so I may learn to think of it in terms of that.


Preferred is argentinian ribeye followed by Entrecote with nice ammount of fat.


interestingly the taste of allways the same does not get boring, while the interest in other tastes I remember kind of fades.


while I save a bit of money by not buying so many other foods anymore, in the end I spend around 50% more per week due to buying so much meat.


I currently eat only beek steaks, ground beef and beef patties, chicken, lamb, eggs, butter, ghee, feta, cheese, yogurt, salmon, mackarel, and i have cut back on my supplements collection. Heck, I now CRAVE for beef.


No pork for me, I have no taste for it. Never had.


I eat once per day, late afternoon or early evening.


I still drink beer, alcoholfree beer and coffee, which all are violations by the definition of the term carnivore diet. But so would be cheese. Lets extend compliance a bit by not becoming a pedantic martyr.


I buy all mil products as organic, also the eggs. Meat, grass feed beef, that is way to unaffordable, I must accept to go with conventional meat. Not ideal, but thats how it is.

[Skybird]

oh, and while I did not say it, I feel grrreat. Very satied, mentally satisfied as well. No prob of just one meal a day. really, going great here.

[ET2SN]

Originally Posted by Skybird

I eat once per day, late afternoon or early evening.

That's because great minds think alike.

I got into healthy eating before I got the formal MS diagnosis.
I tried some of the healthy diets but eating once a day seems to work much better. My Friday burger is my Cheat Day.

Just be careful with the all-beef or caveman stuff. If you catch yourself hitting the supplements harder or you start sweating Lard, you may as well go back to "traditional".

[Skybird]

When I find I indeed stick with it, I will do more research into nutrients content of meat and the ammounts of, then skip some or reduce them. I need to check. Some supps I will stay with since meat cannot replace them and even the soils the grass grows on that beef eats, are deficitary. Also, it is grain-fed beef I eat, not grass fed, which also chnages some of the variables in the formula.


I feel (and can see) that I am on a good way over the past 3, 4 years.

[ET2SN]

Just do the rest of us a favor, do NOT pass gas in an elevator.

Believe me, we'll know..

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by ET2SN

Just do the rest of us a favor, do NOT pass gas in an elevator.

Believe me, we'll know..

It ain't called Chemical warfare for nothing

Markus

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by ET2SN

Just do the rest of us a favor, do NOT pass gas in an elevator.

Believe me, we'll know..

My experience is the opposite. Day 6 of the experiment. Since I do not eat undigastable garbage and fibre anymore, but pretty much everything gets digested and assimilated, I produce much less p... than before, and in the past 5 days sat on the white throne just once (before it was once a day). And no, no constipation. Volume is much less, and farts do not smell. They are less, too.

What I have is an increase in foaming, bubbling sounds. Seems somebody is at work and does his job, which is assimilating stuff.

I am convince dlaready that this way of eating is healthier for our digestion becasue it is more natural and our guts is more adapted tpo this food than to eating somethign else. It has become quite obvious for me.

And this in a cooking thread.

[ET2SN]

Well, just watch what you're doing.

Most of us are Omnivores and not Carnivores.
Carnivores tend to have shorter life-spans.

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by ET2SN

Carnivores tend to have shorter life-spans.

That can be debated. I say it is not so. And the WHO lies.

And on carnivores and omnivores: I quote Dr. Anthony Chaffee from his book "Why we are carnivores and how plants try to poison you":

I think the really only good working functional definition of the word omnivore would be one of two things:

Either: you get as much nutrition out of both plants and animals you can eat them indiscriminately.

Or: there are things mthat you cna only get in plants that you have to have that don't exist in meat - and there are things in meat that you have to have that dont exist in plants. And so you necessarily have to eat both.

Humans dont fall into either of those categories. We have things in meat that we have to have that we cannot get from plants, but ther eis nothign in plants and fungus that we cannot get from meat.

Plain logic here by Dr. Chaffee. Now, if you consider that plants have natures biggets arsenal of toxines and chemical wepaons to prevent getting eaten, then eating them nevertheless does not sound like a reasonable thing to do. Genetically, biologically, metbolically and in the views of the vast majoprity of antropologists we are canrivores. And we do nto chnbage that nature of ours by eating stuff that is not form an anmnals, and is toxic to us. Dr. chaffee indeed desrcribes all chrinic disease ad txicity reactions to species-unapprotiate food. That some plants prepare fruits they want to get etahen so that their nuts get spread, doe snot mean they want them to get eaten by us. Even more so if the guts of the species doing nthis "tranbsport" adds chemicla processes that actualyl turn the tarnsported seeds or nuts into acutqally functional seeds and nuts that can indeed pant new life somewhere.

We are carnivores. We are just canrivoes who do eat also food that is not good for us, but that we learned to eat in the poast becasue despite helath issues it may have been the only way to survive. But cvonside rthis: veterinaries report that many cats and dogs that get fed with idniustruially processed food that contains not just meat but also veggies and grains becasue it is so cheap and increases the profit margin, become human disease they do ntoi suffer form when they eat their species-adequte diet, whcih is meat. These pets and animals then suddenlfy form obesity, diabtes, fatty liver, CHD, herat attacks.

Chaffee was professional rugby player and attended unversity alreadsy at the age of 16. He is a neurosurgeon and shows the body of a superman. He is a carnivore since a very long time. He is one of the world's leading and most wanted experts on this topic. I posted one or two videos with him in the health thread. The book I quoted from is a collection of edited youtube transciptions.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/F6ib6...?feature=share


https://youtube.com/shorts/F6ib6Ntp3s8?feature=shared

[Skybird]

Originally Posted by ET2SN

Carnivores tend to have shorter life-spans.

That can be debated. I say it is not so. And the WHO lies.

And on carnivores and omnivores: I quote Dr. Anthony Chaffee from his book "Why we are carnivores and how plants try to poison you":

I think the really only good working functional definition of the word omnivore would be one of two things:

Either: you get as much nutrition out of both plants and animals you can eat them indiscriminately.

Or: there are things that you can only get in plants that you have to have that don't exist in meat - and there are things in meat that you have to have that dont exist in plants. And so you necessarily have to eat both.

Humans dont fall into either of those categories. We have things in meat that we have to have that we cannot get from plants, but ther eis nothign in plants and fungus that we cannot get from meat.

Plain logic here by Dr. Chaffee. Now, if you consider that plants have natures biggets arsenal of toxines and chemical wepaons to prevent getting eaten, then eating them nevertheless does not sound like a reasonable thing to do. Genetically, biologically, metabolically and in the views of the vast majoprity of antropologists we are canrivores. And we do not change that nature of ours by eating stuff that is not from an animnals, and is toxic to us. Dr. chaffee indeed desrcribes all chronic disease as toxicity reactions to species-unapprotiate food. That some plants prepare fruits they want to get eaten so that their nuts get spread, does not mean they want them to get eaten by >us<. Even more so if the guts of the species doing this "transport" adds chemicla processes that actualyl turn the tarnsported seeds or nuts into acutally functional seeds and nuts that can indeed plant new life somewhere.

We are carnivores. We are just carnivores who do eat also food that is not good for us, but that we learned to eat in the past because despite health issues it may have been the only way to survive. But conside rthis: veterinaries report that many cats and dogs that get fed with industrially processed food that contains not just meat but also veggies and grains becasue it is so cheap and increases the profit margin, become human diseases they do not suffer form when they eat their species-adequate diet, whcih is meat. These pets and animals then suddenly form obesity, diabtes, fatty liver, CHD, heart attacks.

Chaffee was professional rugby player and attended unversity alreadsy at the age of 16. He is a neurosurgeon and shows the body of a superman. He is a carnivore since a very long time. He is one of the world's leading and most wanted experts on this topic. I posted one or two videos with him in the health thread. The book I quoted from is a collection of edited youtube transcriptions.


60 seconds:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/F6ib6...?feature=share

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Ed9IP...?feature=share

.
.