Let's make nature even more natural by ideological-artificial means!

Skybird · 04-26-22, 02:48 PM

^ Distraction.

Take away the physical preconditions of human's manifestation, consider the material precondition for every thought and every emotion, every metobolistic function and every hormon quantity in the bloodstream, every neuron firing and every perception of the senses "computed" by the brain, null and void and meaningless, and you end up with a state of things so free and cleaned of any identity that we have a name for it: "Death". We are in function what the matter defines us to be, we cannot be what our material preconditions do not enable us to be, we can not become more or anything different than what our genes set the limits and borders for within which any individual "interpretation"/manifestation of ours realises itself in interaction with the environment. Biological factors and variables precede the forming of mind and feeling. From Eros to Cosmos, from Cosmos to Logos. Only this way - not the other way around.

Still dont see it? Then put your head into a waterpool and try to breath water by imagining to be a fish.

Social roles are not genetics, and its genetics that decide our skin colour, eyes colour and hair colour and the many other biophysical variables defining us, our hormone state, our pyhsicla strengths and weaknesses, our vulenraiblity for deseases or special strong immunity to them. Without genes, we would not be anything. We would not even exist. You may see people with many "genders" around, that they can choose from and change as they want. I see people with many psychologial problems, and many different sexual tastes and fetishes, appetites and preferences.

The chemical basis of life is not arbitrarily selectable according to taste, vogue, or political demand. You want to change the identity of any lifeform? You have to change its genetical basis, its chemistry. And this is what can be measured in the lab. There comes a woman claiming she "identifies as a man"? I ask for her genetical profile and hormonal profile and such stuff. And this alone decides for me whether or not I take that claim serious. If the data is against it, I know she is having big mental and identity problems and needs therapy. And thats wha I would tell her. Even if she stomps her feet and insists she were a "he".

Le the boys be boys. Let the girls be girls. The one is not better or worse than the other. Let them be equal before the law.

But let both be DIFFERENT. Discrimination means only this, originally: to realise and accept the differences. Modern language has completely perverted this term. And hence, i insist on discriminating.

If one holds it with the Greens, then there is a good and a bad nature. With dogs, fish, fir trees and so on she has done it right, there are two sexes, there nature can and should remain as it is. With the human being, however, it has done some things wrong. It has brought him into the world as a social creature, dependent on society, and thus made him dependent, dependent on the constraints of society, the source of all evil.

Therefore, society must be deconstructed, smashed and rebuilt from the ruins - along with it the old, misshapen, bisexually deformed human being. Man and woman, that's far too little for the Greens, the world is open, trans, bi, diverse and queer. If it is not, then it must be set up that way.

Buddahaid · 04-26-22, 02:54 PM

It is you who does not get it. Why does the German language have four genders?

Skybird · 04-26-22, 03:34 PM

And now grammar... Has been ridden to death over here in Germany, namely by ultrafeminists.

And has practically not much to do with the artic le I quoted, have you realised that...? Genderism is NOT the focus of that article, yet you bring it up.

Of course you can do that, but I have made my point clear on it, and not for the first time. I dont buy all this language policing and social re-engineering crap. I am a bit old-fashioed, and stick with how nature has dersigned our heterosexual species that despoite all ideological furor still needs a male man and a female woman for natural reproduction. Any social designs ignoring this I cannto take serious, sorry - its a safee policy for acchieveing demographic decline and then civilizational and then biological extinction.

Im done with this part of the talk.

04-26-22, 02:48 PM	#1
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,816 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	^ Distraction. Take away the physical preconditions of human's manifestation, consider the material precondition for every thought and every emotion, every metobolistic function and every hormon quantity in the bloodstream, every neuron firing and every perception of the senses "computed" by the brain, null and void and meaningless, and you end up with a state of things so free and cleaned of any identity that we have a name for it: "Death". We are in function what the matter defines us to be, we cannot be what our material preconditions do not enable us to be, we can not become more or anything different than what our genes set the limits and borders for within which any individual "interpretation"/manifestation of ours realises itself in interaction with the environment. Biological factors and variables precede the forming of mind and feeling. From Eros to Cosmos, from Cosmos to Logos. Only this way - not the other way around. Still dont see it? Then put your head into a waterpool and try to breath water by imagining to be a fish. Social roles are not genetics, and its genetics that decide our skin colour, eyes colour and hair colour and the many other biophysical variables defining us, our hormone state, our pyhsicla strengths and weaknesses, our vulenraiblity for deseases or special strong immunity to them. Without genes, we would not be anything. We would not even exist. You may see people with many "genders" around, that they can choose from and change as they want. I see people with many psychologial problems, and many different sexual tastes and fetishes, appetites and preferences. The chemical basis of life is not arbitrarily selectable according to taste, vogue, or political demand. You want to change the identity of any lifeform? You have to change its genetical basis, its chemistry. And this is what can be measured in the lab. There comes a woman claiming she "identifies as a man"? I ask for her genetical profile and hormonal profile and such stuff. And this alone decides for me whether or not I take that claim serious. If the data is against it, I know she is having big mental and identity problems and needs therapy. And thats wha I would tell her. Even if she stomps her feet and insists she were a "he". Le the boys be boys. Let the girls be girls. The one is not better or worse than the other. Let them be equal before the law. But let both be DIFFERENT. Discrimination means only this, originally: to realise and accept the differences. Modern language has completely perverted this term. And hence, i insist on discriminating. If one holds it with the Greens, then there is a good and a bad nature. With dogs, fish, fir trees and so on she has done it right, there are two sexes, there nature can and should remain as it is. With the human being, however, it has done some things wrong. It has brought him into the world as a social creature, dependent on society, and thus made him dependent, dependent on the constraints of society, the source of all evil. Therefore, society must be deconstructed, smashed and rebuilt from the ruins - along with it the old, misshapen, bisexually deformed human being. Man and woman, that's far too little for the Greens, the world is open, trans, bi, diverse and queer. If it is not, then it must be set up that way. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert. Last edited by Skybird; 04-26-22 at 02:59 PM.

04-26-22, 02:54 PM	#2
Buddahaid Shark above Space Chicken Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 9,340 Downloads: 162 Uploads: 0	It is you who does not get it. Why does the German language have four genders? __________________ "However vast the darkness, we must provide our own light." Stanley Kubrick "Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming." David Bowie

04-26-22, 03:34 PM	#3
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,816 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	And now grammar... Has been ridden to death over here in Germany, namely by ultrafeminists. And has practically not much to do with the artic le I quoted, have you realised that...? Genderism is NOT the focus of that article, yet you bring it up. Of course you can do that, but I have made my point clear on it, and not for the first time. I dont buy all this language policing and social re-engineering crap. I am a bit old-fashioed, and stick with how nature has dersigned our heterosexual species that despoite all ideological furor still needs a male man and a female woman for natural reproduction. Any social designs ignoring this I cannto take serious, sorry - its a safee policy for acchieveing demographic decline and then civilizational and then biological extinction. Im done with this part of the talk. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.