Well done with Woody Allen & Roman Polanski. Now go burn your Michael Jackson albums

Skybird · 03-10-20, 10:48 AM

And still I object to an impolicaiton of that beign wekathy makes you already guilty in a criminal sense. I stick to it. Guilt muts be proven by evidence at a court, else we all get into hell'S kitchen. Whjat yioud escribe doe snot neutralise what I say, vienne, it only says that another law principle is heavily violated all the tiem as well: that is that before the law all and everybody, no mmatter their skin colour and gen der, age and social class, wealth and power, have to be equal, and that the law must treat them all equal.

This cannot be repaired by just committing another violation of law: claiming a claim as valid evidence for the supect's guilt already, that justifies that no evidence must be shown for the charges.

We have red about enough cases where somebody saw his career ruined already by somebody else raising chrages that later showed to be untrue. Legally, the accused was fully rehabilitated, and still his career was damnaged and social repuation was in ruins. But if evidence no longer plays any role, than even the legal rehabilitation is no longer possible, and ev erbyody can accuse just everbyody else, and he who yells the liudzest and has the kost wolved howling with him, wins. Volume then is the new standard by which to judge "jutsice".

And if you think of it, this is what already happens in the media's propaganda on daily politics and world issues, opinion streamlining and politically correct mind education.

Believing is not knowing. Claim is nto evidence. Mobbing is not justice. Accusation is not guilt.

03-10-20, 10:48 AM	#6
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,645 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	And still I object to an impolicaiton of that beign wekathy makes you already guilty in a criminal sense. I stick to it. Guilt muts be proven by evidence at a court, else we all get into hell'S kitchen. Whjat yioud escribe doe snot neutralise what I say, vienne, it only says that another law principle is heavily violated all the tiem as well: that is that before the law all and everybody, no mmatter their skin colour and gen der, age and social class, wealth and power, have to be equal, and that the law must treat them all equal. This cannot be repaired by just committing another violation of law: claiming a claim as valid evidence for the supect's guilt already, that justifies that no evidence must be shown for the charges. We have red about enough cases where somebody saw his career ruined already by somebody else raising chrages that later showed to be untrue. Legally, the accused was fully rehabilitated, and still his career was damnaged and social repuation was in ruins. But if evidence no longer plays any role, than even the legal rehabilitation is no longer possible, and ev erbyody can accuse just everbyody else, and he who yells the liudzest and has the kost wolved howling with him, wins. Volume then is the new standard by which to judge "jutsice". And if you think of it, this is what already happens in the media's propaganda on daily politics and world issues, opinion streamlining and politically correct mind education. Believing is not knowing. Claim is nto evidence. Mobbing is not justice. Accusation is not guilt. __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.