![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I don't want to edit existing options, I want to add in more options. That would make LHDs a little more flexible. Huuum... While I'm at it, I wonder if there's a way to make LCACs enter and leave well decks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Free New York
Posts: 3,167
Downloads: 2
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Ok, in order to make a new shipbasedaircraft loadout entry, you have to create a whole new shipclass from scratch, because all the loadouts need to be associated with a given shipclass when it is created, they cannot be added later.
I know how to do it, but I've never done it before, it's quite involved, as you have to change every single entity and object from the original WASP class over to the new WASP class, so I can't give you the exact steps right now, but there are a lot of them. I'll have to cross this bridge at some point, so give me a bit of time and I'll get back to you, but it can be done. Cheers, David PS It's SO much easier just to edit one of the current loadouts... 10 seconds of work verses probably well over an hour if you haven't done it before, and who knows how long if you aren't at all familar with DWedit.
__________________
LW ![]() ![]() Last edited by LuftWolf; 06-10-06 at 09:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Naval Royalty
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,185
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
I also have some public domain information about the composition of post-F-14 carrier air wings and other stuff that I'd like to add to the aircraft carrier database too. That way you could pick a 1990s CAW, a 2006 CAW, a 2010 CAW, etc... It includes everything, including the possibility of adding UCAVs, although the guy who have it to me was a little skeptical of them. They picked a bad time to be making a database of warships. So much is changing right now :-) The big thing I've been focusing on is having lots of options with the LHDs, because the aviation element of an MEU is a very nebulous creature. The Marines like to customize their MEU for the anticipated threat, so there's no such thing as a "standard" aviation element for a MEU the same way there's a "standard" carrier air wing. The other big thing, like I mentioned before, is that with MV-22s coming out, we're going to see more and more of them. It's a shame that one can't stick them aboard. Right now, it looks like they just pulled some stuff off FAS, which is fine to start with, but there's a lot more flexibility in those ships than people really see. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|