[REL] Missions for Collins Class

p7p8 · 01-14-19, 11:42 AM

Did you made some tests for game stability?

Fearless · 01-14-19, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p7p8

Did you made some tests for game stability?

Currently running the Collins Class in the Sicilian Wedding Mission with no issues that I know off. All it did was change the 1-4 rack capacity from \9 to \13

MANoWAR.U52 · 03-17-19, 08:12 PM

Is it possible to get your file from somewhere else?

p7p8 · 03-18-19, 06:03 AM

"Missions for Collins" were in fact original missions from 688 H/K with changed LA to Collins

Really funny, because first or second mission goal was TLAM attack and "creator" of this "new missions for Collins" probably forget about lacking of TLAM missiles onboard Collins class :P

Btw 688 H/K missions are adapted to RA - you can find them in scenario folder if you use RA mod.

MANoWAR.U52 · 03-18-19, 09:38 AM

Is there a reason why you put creator in brackets? Furthermore what you consider funny is not really of my concern and I rather check for myself and I´m glad for everyone that tries to create content for DW. Besides, when several guys tell you to reconsider your attitude perhaps its indeed worth a try.

Anyways not here for an argument just for the file.

p7p8 · 03-18-19, 02:25 PM

When you shows someone else work as your work only because you changed title and playable unit (btw incompetently) it is an argument for criticism.

Btw those files werent available to play without messing with database - which may corrupt MP games.

It's a shame you don't understand things like intellectual property and copyrights.

If you wanna play this original 688 H/K in RA with different platform you can just add in editor:
"Player has choice of platform" attribute, and it will work better than "Collins version" because you dont need to mess with database.

Quote:

Besides, when several guys tell you to reconsider your attitude perhaps its indeed worth a try.

I did and now i'm sure my attitude is exactly like i want

It prevent's me from writing tons of useless advices like people who don't like my style. I know it's painful to you because some time ago i prooved you were wrong and i'm sure you remember this very well.

Fearless · 03-18-19, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p7p8

When you shows someone else work as your work only because you changed title and playable unit (btw incompetently) it is an argument for criticism.

I consider your comment an insult and have reported it. It's now up to the administrators to fix. Also I request this post be locked.

p7p8 · 03-19-19, 03:32 AM

LOL, what insulsts you? The fact that you have made "your" missions unplayable or the fact that you public them as your own work while they are from 688 H/K?

Missions were unplayable without adding additional "hull number" for Collins class and because you forget about changing main goals like TLAM strike (Collins is unable for launching TLAM's).

All of your missions have exactly the same names

In my opinion you should write a word about it but you didn't.

At first i didn't recognise these little changed missions from 688 H/K
I was too excited playing something "new".

Btw i asked Crazy Ivan for adding your favourite Collins hull number (Rankin) and currently is playable.

So if you feel reporting me is necessarily, do what you have to. I don't care.
I still have "your missions" and everyone can do own "research" by comparison RAN OS Perisher and 688 H/K missions rebuilded for RA

RAN OS Perisher

(link above is only for comparison and it's mission pack published by @Fearless as his own)

MANoWAR.U52 · 03-19-19, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by p7p8

I did and now i'm sure my attitude is exactly like i want

It prevent's me from writing tons of useless advices like people who don't like my style.

Well then good luck with being the forum´s prime douche-hat here. For sure will end as a success story for you here.

Also consider your strange believe that there is even an interest in hearing what you call "advice" as mistaken.

p7p8 · 03-19-19, 03:50 PM

I don't understand you: all what you ask about DW you have answer from me (suggestions of good solutions). But you are angry because it's from me.

I will tell you something. I don't care of your opinion and what you think about me. If you ask here about DW and I have proper knowledge I just answer to anybody who ask.

I do not gives advices like:

"If you are new to DW you should 2 months train making turns on your sub"

Its because DW is NOT on this level of simulation. I know somone can think "its cool" but for me it's just intentional misinformation for building myth "DW is only for pro gamers" (which is not true)

Returning to clue of my reply...

In this topic I gave you:
1. Solution how to play these missions with any playable submarine
2. Where to find those missions in RA
3. Advice how to play missions redesigned by @Fearles
4. Warning about fact that some missions redesigned by @Fearles are unable to complete
5. Link to originaly redesigned missions by @Fearles

Nobody gave you more than me :P

And you can only blame me.
It's really funny for me because it shows who you really are.
And it shows that you are just jealous

01-14-19, 11:42 AM	#1
p7p8 Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 742 Downloads: 136 Uploads: 6	Did you made some tests for game stability? __________________

03-18-19, 06:03 AM	#4
p7p8 Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 742 Downloads: 136 Uploads: 6	"Missions for Collins" were in fact original missions from 688 H/K with changed LA to Collins Really funny, because first or second mission goal was TLAM attack and "creator" of this "new missions for Collins" probably forget about lacking of TLAM missiles onboard Collins class :P Btw 688 H/K missions are adapted to RA - you can find them in scenario folder if you use RA mod. __________________

03-19-19, 03:32 AM	#8
p7p8 Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 742 Downloads: 136 Uploads: 6	LOL, what insulsts you? The fact that you have made "your" missions unplayable or the fact that you public them as your own work while they are from 688 H/K? Missions were unplayable without adding additional "hull number" for Collins class and because you forget about changing main goals like TLAM strike (Collins is unable for launching TLAM's). All of your missions have exactly the same names In my opinion you should write a word about it but you didn't. At first i didn't recognise these little changed missions from 688 H/K I was too excited playing something "new". Btw i asked Crazy Ivan for adding your favourite Collins hull number (Rankin) and currently is playable. So if you feel reporting me is necessarily, do what you have to. I don't care. I still have "your missions" and everyone can do own "research" by comparison RAN OS Perisher and 688 H/K missions rebuilded for RA RAN OS Perisher (link above is only for comparison and it's mission pack published by @Fearless as his own) __________________

03-19-19, 03:50 PM	#10
p7p8 Seasoned Skipper Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 742 Downloads: 136 Uploads: 6	I don't understand you: all what you ask about DW you have answer from me (suggestions of good solutions). But you are angry because it's from me. I will tell you something. I don't care of your opinion and what you think about me. If you ask here about DW and I have proper knowledge I just answer to anybody who ask. I do not gives advices like: "If you are new to DW you should 2 months train making turns on your sub" Its because DW is NOT on this level of simulation. I know somone can think "its cool" but for me it's just intentional misinformation for building myth "DW is only for pro gamers" (which is not true) Returning to clue of my reply... In this topic I gave you: 1. Solution how to play these missions with any playable submarine 2. Where to find those missions in RA 3. Advice how to play missions redesigned by @Fearles 4. Warning about fact that some missions redesigned by @Fearles are unable to complete 5. Link to originaly redesigned missions by @Fearles Nobody gave you more than me :P And you can only blame me. It's really funny for me because it shows who you really are. And it shows that you are just jealous __________________

03-17-19, 08:12 PM	#3
MANoWAR.U52 Loader Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 84 Downloads: 109 Uploads: 0	Is it possible to get your file from somewhere else?

03-18-19, 09:38 AM	#5
MANoWAR.U52 Loader Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 84 Downloads: 109 Uploads: 0	Is there a reason why you put creator in brackets? Furthermore what you consider funny is not really of my concern and I rather check for myself and I´m glad for everyone that tries to create content for DW. Besides, when several guys tell you to reconsider your attitude perhaps its indeed worth a try. Anyways not here for an argument just for the file.