SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 08-08-17, 09:07 AM   #8
Rockin Robbins
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: DeLand, FL
Posts: 8,900
Downloads: 135
Uploads: 52


Default

You have to keep in mind here that regardless of what we like, SH5 is in the looney bin, having thoroughly changed a submarine simulation into a hokey arcade game.

Let me explain. In the war, recognition manuals of both sides were awful. In the American submarines, they determined that over half the targets shot at were completely misidentified! Most of those which were identified properly had erroneous information in their recognition manuals.

Basic information, length,masthead height, cabin configuration and heights, were just wrong. Many ships didn't even have an entry at all!

And that makes sense. In order for SH5 to be historically plausible, the German Navy would have had to rent every single Allied ship on the ocean, individually taken each ship to a German harbor of your choice and carefully measured all the parameters of each of thousands of ships. Needless to say, such an undertaking would have bankrupted the Third Reich, even if the Allies were dumb enough to consent to such a scheme.

In fact, great measures were taken to distribute misinformation about the characteristics of ships, done with the knowledge that enemy submarines would be using this info to shoot in their general direction. The Japanese, for instance, sawed off masts, installed fake cabin profiles and distributed false information onthe lengths and capabilities of their ships. They went so far as to build ships which were scale models of other ships, built, in the case I read abut to half scale! What would THAT do to your precious range measurement? Hmmmmm?

Actually, the Kreigsmarine used targeting methods that assumed all measurements of enemy shipping were wrong. They didn't even require target identification to hit. The US Navy, however, relying on their fancy technology (sound familiar?), used the recognition manual to garner masthead height and ship lengths in order to calibrate torpedo targeting. Garbage in--garbage out. US percentage of hits was markedly lower than that of the Germans.

As usual, SH5 has it wrong. That's one of the reasons why SH4 is a better submarine simulation.
Rockin Robbins is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.