SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Modern-Era Subsims > Dangerous Waters
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-17, 02:57 PM   #1
speed150mph
Electrician's Mate
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 132
Downloads: 36
Uploads: 0
Default

I believe they hit the nail on the head. The ring on the 688 prop is most likely for reducing blade tip cavitation noise at slow to moderate speeds. This feature is what gives the 688 class it's somewhat higher silent speed. The Russians main focus with propeller design was speed first and foremost, and ducting the propellers on the diesel boats like the tango was more for protection when operating in shallow water then silencing. We are only now seeing the use of pump jets coming into Russian designs, such as the Borie and the Yasen-m class subs.

In response to the fella who brought up the Alrosa, she was a test bed for pump jets on diesel electric subs. Now pump jets are very effective at dampening noise and cavitation at moderate speeds, but only have a marginal effectiveness at slow crawling speeds. This makes them rather useless on conventional diesel electrics like the kilo as they are generally quiet enough on battery to avoid detection, and more importantly, they are pretty well forced to operate at slow speeds to have adequate range on their batteries.

As mentioned the pump jet comes into it's own at moderate speeds, which diesel patrol subs hardy ever operate at. The Russians deemed it to not be work the higher costs to install it on the subs for so little reward which is the reason why they didn't continue with it. They no doubt however worked the design into their SSN and SSBN designs, since they can operate at the moderate speeds where pump jets become most efficient without worrying about battery life.
__________________
Americans make better submarines? No my friend, Russia makes better submarines, Americans just make better computers
speed150mph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-17, 03:35 PM   #2
Aktungbby
Gefallen Engel U-666
 
Aktungbby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: On a tilted, overheated, overpopulated spinning mudball on Collision course with Andromeda Galaxy
Posts: 30,139
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0


Default The Taming of the Screw

http://americanhistory.si.edu/subs/anglesdangles/taming6.html
Quote:
The tactical speed of a submarine is that speed at which the submarine is quiet enough to remain undetected while tracking enemy submarines effectively, with sources of self-noise reduced to the point that other submarines and ships can be detected using onboard passive sonar sensors. The the maximum burst speed of a submarine is the highest speed that can be achieved by the submarine's propulsion system, regardless of the self-noise created in the process. In the past, the tactical speed of a submarine was typically significantly less than its burst speed, though in the case of the SSN-21 Seawolf it is said that the tactical speed of 25 knots is a significant fraction of the burst speed of the boat.
https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ship/deep.htm Shrouded propulsors are good; Depth is better! The Best Depth for a submarine to avoid detection by a hull-mounted sonar is conventionally regarded as the Sonic Layer Depth plus 100 meters
__________________

"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness?!!
Aktungbby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-17, 05:29 PM   #3
Kapitan
Sub Test Pilot
 
Kapitan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK + Canada
Posts: 7,134
Downloads: 77
Uploads: 7


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by speed150mph View Post
I believe they hit the nail on the head. The ring on the 688 prop is most likely for reducing blade tip cavitation noise at slow to moderate speeds. This feature is what gives the 688 class it's somewhat higher silent speed. The Russians main focus with propeller design was speed first and foremost, and ducting the propellers on the diesel boats like the tango was more for protection when operating in shallow water then silencing. We are only now seeing the use of pump jets coming into Russian designs, such as the Borie and the Yasen-m class subs.

In response to the fella who brought up the Alrosa, she was a test bed for pump jets on diesel electric subs. Now pump jets are very effective at dampening noise and cavitation at moderate speeds, but only have a marginal effectiveness at slow crawling speeds. This makes them rather useless on conventional diesel electrics like the kilo as they are generally quiet enough on battery to avoid detection, and more importantly, they are pretty well forced to operate at slow speeds to have adequate range on their batteries.

As mentioned the pump jet comes into it's own at moderate speeds, which diesel patrol subs hardy ever operate at. The Russians deemed it to not be work the higher costs to install it on the subs for so little reward which is the reason why they didn't continue with it. They no doubt however worked the design into their SSN and SSBN designs, since they can operate at the moderate speeds where pump jets become most efficient without worrying about battery life.
Which sounds about right to be honest it doesnt give much reward but on something like borei and yasen it would indeed be a good reward

this post i put the pictures up of the arse end of alrosa

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=229270
__________________
DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond



Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/

Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/

Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/
Kapitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.