![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#19 | |||||
Commander
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Solar system, mainly on earth
Posts: 476
Downloads: 62
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
you will have near the same bearing rate for a ship going 20 knts at 20 miles and a ship going 10 knts at 10 miles, and also same bearing rate for a ship with a 45° course to you at 20knts and 10 miles. You definitly CAN'T have a range with this method And this is why Target Motion Analysis ... was created ... Quote:
Certainly one of the biggest mistake to do : nothing easier than to evade a torp pinging you at long range. Quote:
Is the target at 5 miles or 15 miles ? when do I have to open the seeker to lock the target ? You talk me about a blind trying to throw the ball into a basket ... And defender will have all time needed, because you gave him informations about torpedo position and threat, to built a big a efficient wall of CM that will make your torps completly crazy ! You even better open the seeker to late, and then turn the torp to 180° than to open your seeker to early. because this way, you passed the CM wall (any confirmed skipper should know how to build a good CM wall) and your torp could come back from behind. So, NEVER open the seeker to early. Quote:
1) just work at TMA when it's time to do and not before (read above...), it takes 2 minutes to make a VERY accurate TMA if you do it at the right time, after you have made a good recording patterns 2) if you apply the method described above, you will have a range at less than 5 % of the real one, say 2% when you are trained. Quote:
torps are now wire guided, are going more than 10 times (for diesel) and 25 times (for nuke) farther than WWII torps, and your sub have much better detection capabilities On what you said, I can tell you never had a decent solution on a manual TMA. You told me about snapshoters story here. And a snapshoter against a confirmed skipper, with manual TMA, is just dead meat ![]() So I just couldn't agree at all to any of your statments above ![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|