Mass stabbing in central London leaves woman dead and six injured

Originally Posted by Nippelspanner

Seriously, what is your point?
2000 years, 1000 years.... would it make any difference to the current situation, to the facts about this ideology?
Again: What is your point? Wait... do you have one?

My point is that there is little to be gained through debating with people who don't have a clue what they are talking about.

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

My point is that there is little to be gained through debating with people who don't have a clue what they are talking about.

No clue?
It seems you don't have a clue, read my latest eductional post number 80 and bask in it so that you may inform your muslim friends of their war that has been waged since before muhammed.

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

My point is that there is little to be gained through debating with people who don't have a clue what they are talking about.

You said that the other day already when you were asked for actual arguments instead of just personal attacks and "no it's not true!" kind of nonsense.

Are we seeing a pattern here?

Originally Posted by Nippelspanner

You said that the other day already when you were asked for actual arguments instead of just personal attacks and "no it's not true!" kind of nonsense.

Are we seeing a pattern here?

As opposed to your 'yes it is true!' arguments? And your fabrications regarding what I am supposed to have said about a book ("the book you defend so fiercely") I hadn't even discussed? If you are actually interested in debate, rather than using this forum as a soapbox, I suggest you put a little more effort into collating a little evidence, and then presenting a coherent argument worthy of response.

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

As opposed to your 'yes it is true!' arguments? And your fabrications regarding what I am supposed to have said about a book ("the book you defend so fiercely") I hadn't even discussed? If you are actually interested in debate, rather than using this forum as a soapbox, I suggest you put a little more effort into collating a little evidence, and then presenting a coherent argument worthy of response.

Nice try. But you may go easier on the reflecting, it's kinda obvious.
Anyways, as to proof... the Quran isn't proof enough on the topic of Islam!?
You start to confuse me, because that is highly nonsensical.

And if you debate Islam, which you do, you automatically debate the Quran.
Just...stop, please.

Originally Posted by Nippelspanner

Nice try. But you may go easier on the reflecting, it's kinda obvious.
Anyways, as to proof... the Quran isn't proof enough on the topic of Islam!?
You start to confuse me, because that is highly nonsensical.

And if you debate Islam, which you do, you automatically debate the Quran.
Just...stop, please.

Where was I 'debating Islam'? I was certainly debating your claims to be an authority on the subject - and nothing you have presented so far suggests to me that you have the slightest qualification in that regard. And no, what is written in a holy book is not in of itself sufficient to discuss a faith. Would you think it reasonable for me to expound at depth on the French Wars of Religion or the Taiping Rebellion based solely on what I'd read in the Bible?

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

Where was I 'debating Islam'?

Alright, that's enough internet for today.

[Feuer Frei!]

Originally Posted by AndyJWest

And no, what is written in a holy book is not in of itself sufficient to discuss a faith.

I must interject and just say this:
The Qur'an is the single most important authority in all of Islam.

So for it not to be considered sufficient, is.......wrong.

Originally Posted by Feuer Frei!

I must interject and just say this:
The Qur'an is the single most important authority in all of Islam.

So for it not to be considered sufficient, is.......wrong.

That's an understatement.
And also very pointless.
Because he knows better.
Although he doesn't know the ideology.
Logic 101.