![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
View Poll Results: Which rudder configuration is best? | |||
Traditional Crucifrom |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 88.89% |
Increasing popular X configuration |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 11.11% |
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#4 | |
Captain
![]() Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 518
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
To sum up the performance differences in a quick nutshell, one could basically say that the X form produces more turning power and thus improved manueverability, but is mechnically more complicated and operationally more complicated. A cruciform gets less turning power, but is simpler. Cruciforms are pretty inuitive to operate, just at a glance, and in the situation where a computer goes down, or for whatever other reason, the ship needs to be steered manually on manual control it can be done pretty successfully. The X form on the other hand, is more complicated, and in the event of a systems failure, would be a nightmare to control. One could go into more detail about the why's and ifs of each design but that about sums it up. I chose the cruciform. Oh, and I'm not sure how easy it is to stream a tow array through an X form rudder... :hmm: |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|