|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: US Navy's Next Gen attack subs: | |||
| Build an improved Seawolf class |
   
|
4 | 50.00% |
| Evolution of the Virginia class |
  
|
2 | 25.00% |
| The US has enough subs/cannot afford more |
  
|
2 | 25.00% |
| Other |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-29-15, 02:38 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Born to Run Silent
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Cougar Trap, Texas
Posts: 21,385
Downloads: 541
Uploads: 224
|
Quote:
Some more info about the VPM: http://news.usni.org/2013/11/04/navy...design-concept http://news.usni.org/2015/04/22/hasc...v-attack-boats  I wonder what the downsides are to stretching the Virginia class another 70 feet? Would it degrade performance? Trying to get too much from a single platform?
__________________
SUBSIM - 26 Years on the Web |
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode