Two TA = No bearing ambiguity

Deathblow · 04-09-06, 05:47 PM

Bah, deep water conflicts are a thing of the past. When is the last time a "my giant fleet versus your giant fleet" conflict was ever plausible... about 15 years ago. Littorals is where its at.

Then again, the littoral modeling in DW is *sigh*

. Can't even figure out how to get the AI subs not to bottom out.

.

Although "simulation" and "balance" are sometime mutually exclusive, if the Akula needed some "boosting" it could alwasy be given the Squall Advanced version, something that I was arguing for a while back, which is toted to have a burst, then slow and search mode.

04-09-06, 05:47 PM	#15
Deathblow Captain Join Date: Sep 2005 Posts: 518 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Bah, deep water conflicts are a thing of the past. When is the last time a "my giant fleet versus your giant fleet" conflict was ever plausible... about 15 years ago. Littorals is where its at. Then again, the littoral modeling in DW is sigh . Can't even figure out how to get the AI subs not to bottom out. . Although "simulation" and "balance" are sometime mutually exclusive, if the Akula needed some "boosting" it could alwasy be given the Squall Advanced version, something that I was arguing for a while back, which is toted to have a burst, then slow and search mode.