![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#9 |
Stowaway
Posts: n/a
Downloads:
Uploads:
|
![]()
so the consensus is that the above ground footer is a bad/dumb idea then, guess i'll be cutting the slab and pouring footers then.
I was thinking more in terms of the footer thickness preventing sagging and cracking of the bricks rather then the shear weight of whats sitting on it cracking the slabs. looks like its time to pour a 12" footer so i'll need 5 rows of block instead of 4 @ wolferz - I understand, we all have stuff to deal with, hopefully you can look it over in a few days and give me your opinions on the best design to go with. I want light weight but strong and looks are secondary, you can cover anything with stucco and pretty it up after the fact. I sent a new design picture with a few small changes to reflect what we talked about here. let me know if I am choosing the best materials and if you think I should put less rebar or none at all in the vertical walls of the landings? I want to keep material costs low but mainly I want to avoid as much weight as I can so I don't want a monolith so heavy it sinks by its own weight. I just want what I "need" and avoid overbuilding this thing I was even wondering about filling the verticals with foam rather then concrete or simply using 16x8x4 blocks stacked on end like bricks and not having any voids to fill. then again maybe I could build forms to just pour solid 4" wide landing walls all at once as one piece, whatever does the job with the least amount of weight load on the ground so it doesn't sink over the years Last edited by Webster; 04-21-15 at 07:34 AM. |
![]() |
|
|