SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > Sub & Naval Discussions: World Naval News, Books, & Films
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-11-15, 04:15 PM   #8
Sailor Steve
Eternal Patrol
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: High in the mountains of Utah
Posts: 50,369
Downloads: 745
Uploads: 249


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
That's exactly what they did!

Murdoch ordered the rudder to hard starboard and engines to full astern in an attempt to 'port around' the iceberg by swinging the ship to the left but the speed was too high and the distance too short for the ship to avoid the iceberg.
That's what I was going to say, but then decided against it. Ships actually turn tighter the faster they go. If they had turned and kept to full speed they might have missed it altogether. Slowing down was the wrong thing to do.

Quote:
There's another school of thought that says that if the Titanic had hit the iceberg head on that it might not have caused as much damage as the glancing blow to the starboard side of the ship did.
I subscribe to that school. A head-on collision would have crushed the bow, but would not have exposed several sections to flooding at the same time.
__________________
“Never do anything you can't take back.”
—Rocky Russo
Sailor Steve is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.