![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: In the conning tower of my VIIC scanning the sea through the periscope
Posts: 1,698
Downloads: 173
Uploads: 7
|
![]()
Damn
![]() I guess I'll toss a dice. From late 1943 a six is an escort with Foxer, 1944 3-6 is a Foxer, and 1945 if I get 2 - 6 there's a Foxer. I have to have some self-discipline there. But not a big problem, I probably wouldn't be alive by late 1943 anyways.
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] NYGM+H.sie v16+Stiebler 4C+MaGui WS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Commander
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saint Lawrence Seaway
Posts: 459
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
![]() Quote:
With 2d10 we can make percentages... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
XO
![]() Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Chorrillos, Lima, Peru
Posts: 401
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Foxers aren't all that. They have significant drawbacks.
First of all, a ship towing a foxer would be detectable by hydrophone at least 140km away. Any foxer mod would need to include this. Second, destroyers towing foxers are limited in their top speed. As far as I know, most SH3 players use GNATs to take out the escorts and then use T3s for the cargo ships. Finally, German engineering created the T11, which ignores Foxer noise, towards the end of the war. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|