SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-17-15, 09:06 AM   #2446
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

Another hopeful sign, the EU is starting to break the Taboo about ignoring Russian Army units in East Ukraine:

Quote:

The EU has broken its taboo on referring to Russian forces in east Ukraine in its official documents.

It said in its Official Journal on Monday (16 February) that Russian deputy defence minister Anatoly Antonov is being added to its blacklist because he is “involved in supporting the deployment of Russian troops in Ukraine”.

It listed first deputy defence minister Arkady Bakhin for the same reason.

It also listed Andrei Kartapolov, a senior Russian military commander, for being “involved in shaping and implementing the military campaign of the Russian forces in Ukraine”.

The text in the legal gazette was signed off by EU foreign relations chief Federica Mogherini.


https://euobserver.com/foreign/127667

Unless Putin radically changes course soon, it wont be long until military aid is flowing to Ukraine.
__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 11:29 AM   #2447
Oberon
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 25,976
Downloads: 61
Uploads: 20


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikalugin View Post
(such as withdrawing heavy armaments ...)
That seems to be the current sticking point for both sides, and since OCSE inspectors are unable to enter the Debaltsevo area... It's the traditional 'Who blinks first', the separatists probably don't want to withdraw their heavy weaponry until the Ukrainian forces do, and vice versa for the Ukrainian forces...not to mention that the separatists probably have a strong desire to press home their current advantage and eliminate as many Ukrainian forces as they can so that there will be less to face them come summer.
Oberon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 11:33 AM   #2448
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,056
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Yup, both sides are saying that they withdraw their heavy weapons, if the other side does so first.

@Bilge_Rat: How do you know those are T-72B3s? I dont think the B3 is externally very much different from older models.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 12:03 PM   #2449
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

One of the issues with Debaltsevo specifically is that it ended up in a sort of grey area. The separatists are claiming that it's theirs under ceasefire terms (because they had previously controlled it), the Ukrainian army refuses to withdraw.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 12:55 PM   #2450
antikristuseke
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Estland
Posts: 4,330
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Default

https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-a...llery-attacks/
Quote:
The Bellingcat investigation team used internationally-recognized methods and satellite imagery to analyze a total of 1,353 artillery craters in eastern Ukraine and determine their trajectories. We located firing positions that closely matched these trajectories, all of which were inside Russian territory with one exception (which was less than 2km from the Russian border).

Three artillery attack case studies were investigated in this report: Amvrosiivka (14 July 2014), between Dolzhanskaya-Capital mine and the village of Panchenkove (16 July to 8 August 2014), and Khmelnytskyi (25 July 2014). Artillery crater analysis concluded that there were a total of ten primary attack trajectories across all the case studies. From each of these attack trajectories a firing position was identified. Nine of these firing positions were – without any doubt – within the territory of Russia, with three within 400 to 800m of a military camp. The one position in Ukraine was near Chervonopartyzansk, within the territory of Ukraine 1.2km south, and 1.5km north of the border with Russia.
I have no idea how credible that report is, but if it is true, this is fairly damning.

ikalugin, about those medals, never though they were official Russian issue, given that they were for sale with prices underneath it looked like a private enterprise, I was just curious if it was a real thing or someones idea of a joke. Thanks.
antikristuseke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 02:19 PM   #2451
XabbaRus
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,330
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0


Default

Ah yes bellingcat. I'm just not convinced. I know the guy is the poster child for "citizen journalism" but after the press were proclaiming him a chemical weapons expert I turned off. Something doesn't add up. Given 12 months ago he was sitting at home playing World of Warcraft.
__________________
XabbaRus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 02:21 PM   #2452
CCIP
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Waterloo, Canada
Posts: 8,700
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 2


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by antikristuseke View Post
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-a...llery-attacks/


I have no idea how credible that report is, but if it is true, this is fairly damning.

ikalugin, about those medals, never though they were official Russian issue, given that they were for sale with prices underneath it looked like a private enterprise, I was just curious if it was a real thing or someones idea of a joke. Thanks.
Now that is interesting! This is the sort of stuff I'd like to see more of as evidence goes, but only if it's backed up by official reports after. I hope there are official investigations that follow it.

Otherwise, would not surprise me. The recent pictures of landed/unexploded projectiles also point to use of Tornado systems pretty definitively. Wherever they're being shot from, these are obviously Russian artillery systems.
__________________

There are only forty people in the world and five of them are hamburgers.
-Don Van Vliet
(aka Captain Beefheart)
CCIP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 02:44 PM   #2453
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post

@Bilge_Rat: How do you know those are T-72B3s? I dont think the B3 is externally very much different from older models.
these have been identified as SOSNA-U thermal sights which is apparently only found on the latest T-72B3 model.

__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 02:49 PM   #2454
mapuc
CINC Pacific Fleet
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 20,579
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 0


Default

Some more thoughts

Some one wrote that (name of weapon type, who I forgot the name off) need a trained crew.

1. Does Ukraine have similar weapons in their arsenal as Russia has been send to Eastern Ukraine ?

2. If yes, aren't many of the Ukrainian soldier been trained to use these weapons among these even soldier who live in Eastern Ukraine.

If no in both question, then it must be russian soldier that are controlling these weapons or ?

Markus
mapuc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 03:29 PM   #2455
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,056
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat View Post
these have been identified as SOSNA-U thermal sights which is apparently only found on the latest T-72B3 model.
That rectangular 'window'? No, it's on many many many maaany T-72s. No idea what it is, periscope I would assume, but it definitely isnt some Russian only equipment.

See, that's my problem. The Loyalists are trying to force the public opinion against Russia.
And the West is with them. They show us blurry satellite photos of.. err.. something and say "Yep, RUSSIANS!".

I am definitely not on the Russian side here, hell I'm a Finn ffs.
But the past week or two, it has been just Loyalists throwing crap and hoping it'll stick, none of it hasnt.

West needs some actual, concrete evidence of Russian units being involved, before they make the decision to supply Ukraine with military aid.
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 03:51 PM   #2456
Catfish
Dipped Squirrel Operative
 
Catfish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky
Posts: 17,811
Downloads: 38
Uploads: 0


Default

^ @Dowly: Exactly that.

Our german (transatlantic young leaders lmao) media showing some russian tanks in Georgien from years ago, and selling us this as russian tanks being now on ukrainian soil. Have done that repeatedly, and everytime proven as falso, so they had to excuse, everytime.
Liars.
Catfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 03:55 PM   #2457
Betonov
Navy Seal
 
Betonov's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,647
Downloads: 26
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post

See, that's my problem. The Loyalists are trying to force the public opinion against Russia.
And the West is with them. They show us blurry satellite photos of.. err.. something and say "Yep, RUSSIANS!"...

West needs some actual, concrete evidence of Russian units being involved, before they make the decision to supply Ukraine with military aid.
If the West is ready to accept blurry satellite photos of... er... something without actual concrete evidence, is it possible that the West has already decided that the Russians are to blame, evidence be damned.
Betonov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 04:25 PM   #2458
Bilge_Rat
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: standing watch...
Posts: 3,856
Downloads: 344
Uploads: 0
Default

how to spot a T-72B3:



now compare that to the three tanks in the video I posted.
__________________
Bilge_Rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 04:25 PM   #2459
Dowly
Lucky Jack
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 25,056
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Betonov View Post
If the West is ready to accept blurry satellite photos of... er... something without actual concrete evidence, is it possible that the West has already decided that the Russians are to blame, evidence be damned.
Maybe, maybe not. I don't know.

What I know is:
We've been show blurry satellite images, showing blastmarks and rectangulars, identified as Russians. I would like to see those original high res images.

Videos of Russians tanks, that Ukraine doesn't use. Still waiting for anyone to point out what makes those tanks Russian tanks?

There's more, but lastly, if there are so many Russian units in Ukraine,
where are the bodies? Where are photos of them?
If they are fighting, surely there'd be some evidence of them being there?

But.. we got nothing, just words saying "RUSSIANS!"
Dowly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-15, 04:37 PM   #2460
kranz
The Old Man
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 1,430
Downloads: 5
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly View Post

There's more, but lastly, if there are so many Russian units in Ukraine,
where are the bodies? Where are photos of them?
If they are fighting, surely there'd be some evidence of them being there?

But.. we got nothing, just words saying "RUSSIANS!"
mass secret burials in Pskov and mobile crematories are nothing. ok.

I still have a few posts to reply to but I'll do it in 'due time'.
kranz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
nato, putin, ukraina, ukraine, ukrajna


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.