![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
Kuznetsov does suffer from powerplant problems (which limit the top speed), but those come from the fact that it did not complete even a single repair/docking cycle.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
At least it is not as bad as with the pr.956 destroyers - their power plant is not known to age well, especially if poorly maintained, and this essentially immobilised most of those ships.
On the contrary - pr.1155 ships are fairly reliable and available for missions. Hence probably why there is some speculation about the pr.1155 refit rather than pr.956 refit (having better sonar and helicopter hangar does help). |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]()
I wish though that Russia had 1 naval theatre instead of 4, this would allow us to have a decent naval grouping in it (2-3 nuclear powered heavy cruisers, carrier, 3 cruisers, 10 destroyers, 8 frigates plus other stuff).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
Aye, spread too thin....the UK learned that lesson long ago.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|