SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-24-14, 05:33 AM   #1
suitednate
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 198
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post

I've had two careers terminated in this way; so you are not alone.

After the second time, and other close calls, I made alterations to the files in my game (via a mini-mod), and have used it.



CapnScurvy showed how to fix the issue in this post:

http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=183764

I haven't played very much since, but last time I had aircraft fly by, I was able to stay at p/d without being attacked. It took some time to get to this point, as I was strongly inclined to crash dive at the mere mention of aircraft.


Thank you very much!! I will check it out!!
suitednate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-14, 07:34 AM   #2
BigWalleye
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: On the Eye-lond, mon!
Posts: 1,987
Downloads: 465
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suitednate View Post
Thank you very much!! I will check it out!!
Submarines at PD are often pretty easy to spot from the air in the clear waters of the Pacific. There's a pic soemwhere online of an LA class at PD - not hard to see at all. So if you are playing historically, PD shouldn't be considered safe under good visibility in the PTO. Doing so is a gamble.

Merry Christmas.
BigWalleye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-14, 05:19 PM   #3
suitednate
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 198
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigWalleye View Post
Submarines at PD are often pretty easy to spot from the air in the clear waters of the Pacific. There's a pic soemwhere online of an LA class at PD - not hard to see at all. So if you are playing historically, PD shouldn't be considered safe under good visibility in the PTO. Doing so is a gamble.

Merry Christmas.
Agreed, I knew that about PD but I was at 150 ft or so.
suitednate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-14, 05:41 PM   #4
merc4ulfate
DILLIGAF
 
merc4ulfate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: florida
Posts: 2,058
Downloads: 210
Uploads: 0
Default

If you were spotted from a distance before you dove it will not make a difference ... they will strafe and depth charge you where they feel you may be.
__________________
Self-education is, I firmly believe, the only kind of education there is.
~Isaac Asimov~

Mercfulfate
将補
日本帝國海軍

merc4ulfate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-14, 01:03 AM   #5
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigWalleye View Post
Submarines at PD are often pretty easy to spot from the air in the clear waters of the Pacific. There's a pic soemwhere online of an LA class at PD - not hard to see at all.
While it was certainly possible to spot a submerged submarine from the air, under favorable conditions, I don't think it was particularly likely. I remember Fluckey had a situation, where he was at p/d near a port/base, and a small aircraft flew over them at low altitude, and they were not spotted. I believe most skippers considered themselves reasonably safe at 90 ft.


TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-14, 03:22 AM   #6
suitednate
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 198
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorpX View Post
While it was certainly possible to spot a submerged submarine from the air, under favorable conditions, I don't think it was particularly likely. I remember Fluckey had a situation, where he was at p/d near a port/base, and a small aircraft flew over them at low altitude, and they were not spotted. I believe most skippers considered themselves reasonably safe at 90 ft.


I checked out that thread u mentioned and made the modifications but the same scenario still played out again. Dove and he wasn't even coming for me this time but then after a little while at 150 ft at 32x TC all of a sudden I get damage all over from a DC attack and sunk. Heavier seas too.
suitednate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-14, 11:04 AM   #7
BigWalleye
Sea Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: On the Eye-lond, mon!
Posts: 1,987
Downloads: 465
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suitednate View Post
I checked out that thread u mentioned and made the modifications but the same scenario still played out again. Dove and he wasn't even coming for me this time but then after a little while at 150 ft at 32x TC all of a sudden I get damage all over from a DC attack and sunk. Heavier seas too.
TC=32 means that one minute of game time takes less than 2 seconds of real time. And in 10 seconds of real time, more than 5 minutes of game time have elapsed. How many passes could the plane make in 5 minutes? And how many depth charges could he drop? IMO, TC=32 is dangerously high in that situation. YMMV.
BigWalleye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-14, 01:31 PM   #8
suitednate
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 198
Downloads: 43
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CapnScurvy View Post
I had a hunch that RFB 2.0 had done some "tweaking" with the planes visuals and I'm right. LukeFF let the issue of planes "seeing" through water really get out of hand with this one. For my curiosity I followed up on what, if anything, RFB 2.0 may have done. Here's what I found.



This entry sets the "size" of an object seen by the sensor its linked to. In this case the Air2_Visual is what the RFB planes use. This -75.0 wouldn't mean anything unless you have a base number to compare it to. The stock parameter for this entry is 0.0. So, RFB 2.0 decided to make the size of an object seen really small. Which means it will see objects much easier than an 0.0 set entry.

Let's look at TMO 2.0 which has a known effect of having it's sub "seen" under water.




TMO 2.0 has this parameter set at only -2.2. Quite a difference from the -75.0 RFB entry. I suspect because of the chatter from TMO players this issue was changed with the TMO 2.1 patch. Here's the entry for it.




The entry is set back to stock again. So it looks like Duci heard some of your thoughts about having the sub seen through the water and did something about it. Good for him!

Now if he would only do something about the Hiryu having a 20 meter mast height?!

It seems as though there are more "air sensor" parameters for RFB than in stock or TMO. Do I switch all of them? Or just one? There's AirB, AirS, and Air2. Anyone know what the difference is?
suitednate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-14, 07:32 PM   #9
Hambone307
Planesman
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 188
Downloads: 93
Uploads: 0
Default

Interesting about the change in the spotting code.
I lost 3 of my boats to "lucky" DC runs from planes. First one was in an S-Boat. I blame my watch crew for that SNAFU. Didn't spot the plane until he was about 8,000 ft away. Needless to say that I was hit with two charges before my conning tower was under.
The other two boats I lost were Porpoise class, and I could have sworn that there was an issue with my mod soup since I had been nailed with both of the charges at approx. 170ft.
The S-Boat incident was a sobering lesson to a skipper just out of submarine school!
__________________
____
I can't tell if I have found a rope or lost my horse.
Hambone307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-14, 04:55 PM   #10
TorpX
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,975
Downloads: 153
Uploads: 11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by suitednate View Post
It seems as though there are more "air sensor" parameters for RFB than in stock or TMO. Do I switch all of them? Or just one? There's AirB, AirS, and Air2. Anyone know what the difference is?
I couldn't remember what values I changed for my game, so checking the file, I saw I only changed the one shown. Thinking about it, I decided to change all the Air sensors as to 0. I assume that they are associated with different models of aircraft, but don't really know. Maybe someone around here can say for sure.


TorpX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.