Malaysian Airlines MH317

[Skybird]

Dowly, as already in August was said (and earlier in this thread), there are claims that radar tracking data exist(ed). And a Spanish air control guy mysteriously disappeared, it seems he has not shown up again, ever. If this man existed, one must wonder if he even is still alive.

That the plane was shot down over land, seems to be no worry regarding witnesses when it is claimed that a BUK downed it. But when the same plane was shot down not by a BUK but an interceptor you think it is a concern regarding witnesses on the ground? What is the difference?

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Dowly, as already in August was said (and earlier in this thread), there are claims that radar tracking data exist(ed). And a Spanish air control guy mysteriously disappeared, it seems he has not shown up again, ever. If this man existed, one must wonder if he even is still alive.

Who is the radar operator? Is he really missing? His/her co-workers/boss/family would have reported him/her missing, but they did not, why? All extremely relevant questions.

That the plane was shot down over land, seems to be no worry regarding witnesses when it is claimed that a BUK downed it. But when the same plane was shot down not by a BUK but an interceptor you think it is a concern regarding witnesses on the ground? What is the difference?

Witnesses' saw the plane in 5-6 different places. Eyewitnesseses, while important are not reliable in most cases.

I have no idea what happened to the plane, but I think's it's highly unlikely it went everywhere but south. (personal opinion)