"Fury" - Movie. Bollywood Boycott Time again

Dowly · 10-17-14, 02:00 PM

Why is it that movies made in modern day about WWII are critisised for their inaccuracies, when stuff like "Eagles Has Landed" are considered a classic?

What's the difference?

Not saying it's a bad or good movie, havent seen it, but maybe we should before we say 'yay' or 'nay'.

At least we get to see a real Tiger this time (and Sherman).

Kptlt. Neuerburg · 10-17-14, 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dowly

Why is it that movies made in modern day about WWII are critisised for their inaccuracies, when stuff like "Eagles Has Landed" are considered a classic?

What's the difference?

I think the difference here is that "The Eagle Has Landed" is based off of a novel by Jack Higgins so it's already is "historically inaccurate" in a way, whereas "Fury" is supposed to be based off a true story and Hollywood manages to get the historical aspects wrong. If I do decide to see "Fury" it's going to be after some reviews are out.

10-17-14, 02:00 PM	#1
Dowly Lucky Jack Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Finland Posts: 25,054 Downloads: 32 Uploads: 0	Why is it that movies made in modern day about WWII are critisised for their inaccuracies, when stuff like "Eagles Has Landed" are considered a classic? What's the difference? Not saying it's a bad or good movie, havent seen it, but maybe we should before we say 'yay' or 'nay'. At least we get to see a real Tiger this time (and Sherman).