Malaysian Airlines MH317

TarJak · 08-08-14, 07:25 PM

I've not a care which side did the deed. I'm interested in the facts only and not idle speculation or conspiracy theories.

Dread Knot · 08-08-14, 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TarJak

I've not a care which side did the deed. I'm interested in the facts only and not idle speculation or conspiracy theories.

Agreed. Especially the crude attempts on some people's part to make this tragedy prove some other crack pot conspiracy theory.

Skybird · 08-09-14, 04:59 AM

Again, show where it is "conspiration theory".

It is, by all what I can say, a reasonable theory indeed, thought out well and covering all known - and now "once known" facts and released materials. He is able to explain it all reasonably and with an easy, simple, elegant theory - and without needing to construct absurd conspiracies and fantasy-enriched nonsense. The scenario sounds perfectly realistic, and it is such that it explains all known pieces of info, in a simple, reasonable and elegant way.

That is much more than you two can show up with: rhetorics meant to prevent a scenario being brought to people's attention and to public discussion that you would not welcome to be true.

If the same theory would end in: it were the Russians, there would be postings like "I told you so, damn those Russians" by now.

I do not claim the theory by the man is true. I say it is reasonable enough a theory, and sufficiently thought out, to justify giving it serious examination and consideration. And certainly more credit than just claiming "it is conspiracy theory, the man should wear a tin foil hat".

08-09-14, 04:59 AM	#3
Skybird Soaring Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: the mental asylum named Germany Posts: 42,637 Downloads: 10 Uploads: 0	Again, show where it is "conspiration theory". It is, by all what I can say, a reasonable theory indeed, thought out well and covering all known - and now "once known" facts and released materials. He is able to explain it all reasonably and with an easy, simple, elegant theory - and without needing to construct absurd conspiracies and fantasy-enriched nonsense. The scenario sounds perfectly realistic, and it is such that it explains all known pieces of info, in a simple, reasonable and elegant way. That is much more than you two can show up with: rhetorics meant to prevent a scenario being brought to people's attention and to public discussion that you would not welcome to be true. If the same theory would end in: it were the Russians, there would be postings like "I told you so, damn those Russians" by now. I do not claim the theory by the man is true. I say it is reasonable enough a theory, and sufficiently thought out, to justify giving it serious examination and consideration. And certainly more credit than just claiming "it is conspiracy theory, the man should wear a tin foil hat". __________________ If you feel nuts, consult an expert.

08-08-14, 07:25 PM	#1
TarJak Fleet Admiral Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 17,052 Downloads: 150 Uploads: 8	I've not a care which side did the deed. I'm interested in the facts only and not idle speculation or conspiracy theories.