![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
![]() |
#1 |
Soaring
|
![]()
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...ian-radar.html
If the man is right, then ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Medic
![]() Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 167
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
Is there anything the F-35 can do?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,288
Downloads: 85
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
The only thing this boondoogle has accomplished is that it has somewhat masked the arrival of it's successor technology. Drones and UAVs will out perform, out last and have beat the F35 to operational status. One reason we are still pushing manned fighters is that pilots run the air corps, pilots like to fly and pilots like to be heroes. Imaging yourself sitting in a bar in Omaha talking to a pimple faced computer geek kid in a uniform telling you about the hairiest missions he "flew" from his console.
Same thing in space exploration. Manned space missions get all the attention and most of the money. But's it's the satellites , probes and rovers doing all the work. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Soaring
|
![]()
It's also nice that at the end the author mentions the risk of having all armed forces basing on just one or two genuine platform design. I would always vote for having a greater diversity in altenrttive platforms in service, so that if one gets compromised by an enemy, not all forces are automatically effected. That starts with sophisticated electronics and carrier platforms, and ends on even a low level like infantry firearms.
On the F35 I always thought that for what it can do it simply is hopelessly, HOPELESSLY, overpriced. Same is true for the F22. Even if technological superiority were given, it can compensate numerical inferiority only to a certain degree, and not beyond. An d a single loss of such an expensive hightech toy scores more hurting than two or three losses of a platform in a fleet where there are more units available. But probably the whole defence industry in the US is a profit and job generating measurement anyway. The dominant weapons of the coming next major war, are cyberweapons. And that war has gone hot already.
__________________
If you feel nuts, consult an expert. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,184
Downloads: 248
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
If the man is right… lol
Also… there is no lack of diversity so far. Besides that .. all the knowledge base built upon f 35 will most likely come handy in the future. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Chief of the Boat
|
![]()
If true then the blame will be on the Pentagon who laid down the build requirements.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Rear Admiral
![]() |
![]()
Increase your national debt.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
Yes. Can be purchased by Australia.
__________________
“You're painfully alive in a drugged and dying culture.” ― Richard Yates, Revolutionary Road |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Best Admiral in the USN
|
![]()
Of course it can't.
![]() Last edited by Admiral Halsey; 04-29-14 at 07:53 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Lucky Jack
![]() |
![]()
For the arms industries that is great news as they can now beg for more money for long term research to find out why it is a flop.
The gravy train.
__________________
Dr Who rest in peace 1963-2017. ![]() To borrow Davros saying...I NAME YOU CHIBNALL THE DESTROYER OF DR WHO YOU KILLED IT! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
CINC Pacific Fleet
![]() |
![]()
I do hope that this information is given to the Danish Minister of Defence
'cause if this is true, it's a huge.(forgot the word)for F-35 Could be false alarm, but I don't know. Markus |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: On a mighty quest for the Stick of Truth
Posts: 5,963
Downloads: 52
Uploads: 0
|
Time to break out the F-117 goblins and send the F-35 back to design.
![]()
__________________
![]() Tomorrow never comes |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Navy Seal
![]() |
![]()
The F-35 was never intended to fly over Russian airspace ... where would it take off from the Aleutian Islands or a CVA?
They would know the moment it was air born or refueled. There are lots of Air Force and USN planes in the desert in Arizona that were never used as the original design was meant for ... spells war. which is just fine with me ... no reason to knock the F-35 ... I say let it fly. The real problem is Russian jets flying over American soil with permission that may soon be ended: http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...can-skies.html Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Frogman
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 302
Downloads: 130
Uploads: 0
|
![]()
At least someone was think'n ahead and had a back up plan:
http://www.wired.com/2013/03/navy-stealth-plan-b/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Fleet Admiral
![]() |
![]()
The real problem with the F35 is the reason it was designed and built the way it is appears to have been forgotten.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|