Neanwhile at 65 feet,,,

Platapus · 04-23-14, 04:45 PM

If we are comparing the actors to the character in the book, thank I think Daniel Craig is the most accurate. Too bad the scripts are crap.

James Bond was not some sophisticated pretty boy. He was a more a thug type. As "M" once described him, Bond was a blunt instrument.

One of the many reasons I much prefer the books than the movies. But the earlier movies were entertaining.

Now if we can only give Daniel Craig a good Bond script.....

I would like it if they used Craig and remade the original books.. as they were written.

But no CGI no movie.

04-23-14, 04:45 PM	#3
Platapus Fleet Admiral Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 19,395 Downloads: 63 Uploads: 0	If we are comparing the actors to the character in the book, thank I think Daniel Craig is the most accurate. Too bad the scripts are crap. James Bond was not some sophisticated pretty boy. He was a more a thug type. As "M" once described him, Bond was a blunt instrument. One of the many reasons I much prefer the books than the movies. But the earlier movies were entertaining. Now if we can only give Daniel Craig a good Bond script..... I would like it if they used Craig and remade the original books.. as they were written. But no CGI no movie. __________________ abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.