|
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997
|
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
|
|||||||||
| View Poll Results: Which wave mod do you use/find more realistic? | |||
| none (stock wave settings) |
   
|
1 | 4.17% |
| Improved Waves V1.1 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Real Environment - Rev 3 / DynEnv v2.9 - Breeze |
  
|
4 | 16.67% |
| DynEnv v2.9 - Gale |
  
|
6 | 25.00% |
| DynEnv v2.9 - Gale Improved |
  
|
9 | 37.50% |
| DynEnv v2.9 - Hurricane |
  
|
3 | 12.50% |
| sobers waves mod (specify which version) |
|
3 | 12.50% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
04-22-14, 02:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
Count Dracula
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: 46°13′N, 24°47′E
Posts: 1,816
Downloads: 405
Uploads: 0
|
i just voted ... and really like your work gap
__________________
|
|
|
|
04-22-14, 03:09 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Navy Seal
 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CJ8937
Posts: 8,215
Downloads: 793
Uploads: 10
|
Quote:
 Just a quick remark on your preferences. Both DynEnv v2.9 - Gale and DynEnv v2.9 - Gale Improved, use six seatype definitions (respectively for 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 m/s), instead of the four stock seatypes (0, 5, 10 and 15 m/s). Going by what TDW is stating in this post, the game should ignore the last two sets of parameters (12 and 15 m/s). Yet, both mods seem to work perfectly even for wind speeds equal to or higher than 12 m/s. I still don't get where the game gets the missing sea types from, since after 9 m/s wind speed (SeaType 3) there wouldn't be a seatype that the game can interpolate. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
