Yet another 'periscope' thread...

Sniper297 · 01-31-14, 10:42 PM

"I do not think it is unrelated. I actually see better at night with the observation scope than I can with the attack scope"

Original topic is about being seen, not seeing. Most used the night scope (observation) after first contact at long range, even in the daytime because it had better magnification. At closer range they went a few feet deeper and used the attack scope because a 3 inch diameter pole is harder to see than a 6 inch diameter pole. What the OP was theorizing was all the magical psychic detection might be from users raising the observation scope instead of the attack scope at close range, but people are reporting detection from 4000 yards away - at that range a telephone pole wouldn't be visible, ergo which scope is irrelevant.

01-31-14, 10:42 PM	#11
Sniper297 The Old Man Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Philadelphia Shipyard Brig Posts: 1,386 Downloads: 160 Uploads: 19	"I do not think it is unrelated. I actually see better at night with the observation scope than I can with the attack scope" Original topic is about being seen, not seeing. Most used the night scope (observation) after first contact at long range, even in the daytime because it had better magnification. At closer range they went a few feet deeper and used the attack scope because a 3 inch diameter pole is harder to see than a 6 inch diameter pole. What the OP was theorizing was all the magical psychic detection might be from users raising the observation scope instead of the attack scope at close range, but people are reporting detection from 4000 yards away - at that range a telephone pole wouldn't be visible, ergo which scope is irrelevant.