NEW VERSION OF IXB&IXC Type - Page 14

Wise · 11-16-13, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by privateer

Do you REALLY want to go there?

And in thoughts isn't present

11-16-13, 01:49 PM

I have no clue what you mean.

Wise · 11-16-13, 01:58 PM

And I don't understand you. I didn't say that I want to go somewhere. I told that I am surprised by that fact that we should correct others modellers errors. What here the unclear?
But, in reply you ask me, whether I want to go somewhere.

11-16-13, 02:06 PM

You stated your mod was for STOCK SH3.
Others wanted it for GWX so instead of changeing ID's for your mod you attack GWX Devs (ME) for mistakes?
I would expect better from kovall at the very lest.
(Should I remind him of WHO gave him the tools to rip SH5 models?)

You obviously have no clue as to the history of Modding for SH3, where Units came from or who/why things were done in GWX.

Instead you place all blame on GWX Devs that your mod does not work with GWX.

How about sticking to the basic subject and stop the ignorant blame game?

KarabekianKaleun · 11-16-13, 02:12 PM

Privateer you are too quick to judge. When I read the post it says "We made this mod for you for free on our own time and now you want us to make it work with something made by someone else and for a mod we do not use."

11-16-13, 02:15 PM

That quickly devolved into placeing the blame on GWX.
Not acceptable.

Wise · 11-16-13, 02:35 PM

First, I anybody didn't attack. These are only your fabrications. People want to see these boats in GWX, but because of mistakes at creation of this global mod, there not to introduce these boats. It is necessary to correct errors which we didn't do. And it surprises me. Only and all. And to be surprised, this my right.
Secondly, your cooperation with kovall, this your business. But, explain to me, what relation to given mod has your cooperation? Where you saw in this mod SH5 models? Personally I didn't use any fact of your cooperation. To me it to anything.
Thirdly, my later emergence at SUBSIM forum, at all doesn't mean that I got acquainted with SH3 only yesterday.
And in the fourth. If you decided to make simply scandal from scratch, I ask you, choose for this purpose somebody another.
All the best.

11-16-13, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wise

These are only your fabrications.

Calling me a liar won't help.

Quote:

People want to see these boats in GWX, but because of mistakes at creation of this global mod, there not to introduce these boats. It is necessary to correct errors which we didn't do.

Your mod was never intended to work with other mods! Read your own first post!

Quote:

.
Thirdly, my later emergence at SUBSIM forum, at all doesn't mean that I got acquainted with SH3 only yesterday.

You show no proof of experience of the development of GWX or the in creation of the AI Subs used nor who did the ones in GWX. Yet made your statements.

Quote:

And in the fourth. If you decided to make simply scandal from scratch, I ask you, choose for this purpose somebody another.

Then stop supporting mis-statements made by lack of knowledge since you know so much. Support your mod without trying to make excuses!

HW3 · 11-16-13, 03:01 PM

How about instead of saying "fix errors of", we say "make compatible with" gentlemen?

11-16-13, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HW3

How about instead of saying "fix errors of", we say "make compatible with" gentlemen?

That is the whole issue.
Users started making post about doing just that.
Instead of being civil and doing PM's or asking advise/suggestions?
It became 'All GWX Dev fault' our mod don't work.

As a past Commander of that same GWX Team?
I can not, in good conscience, let it keep going in that direction.
That would be a dis-service to all the Modders works that were included in the final release.

This Mod is a fantastic bit of work! I like it, and yes, I have it!

I also fixed things by changeing the mod ID's not the GWX ID's.
And I didn't point fingers and blame the Modders.

Jimbuna · 11-16-13, 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HW3

How about instead of saying "fix errors of", we say "make compatible with" gentlemen?

Yes, that would be a good way forward...so we all move on now...yes?

11-16-13, 03:30 PM

No.
Not yet.
I need those few answers to allegations posted in public.
They were post in public so let's finish this.

areo16 · 11-16-13, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by privateer

(Should I remind him of WHO gave him the tools to rip SH5 models?)

Wait, wait, wait, wait just one second.

You have the tools to rip SH5 models and you haven't released them to the public? Why?

11-16-13, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by areo16

Wait, wait, wait, wait just one second.

You have the tools to rip SH5 models and you haven't released them to the public? Why?

That would be because I missed the memo that said I had to?

I also use code that gets a disapproveing notice from others.
I agreed to not do a general release to the public so as to not get my arse sued off.

Wise · 11-16-13, 03:52 PM

I could confirm any told word! But, I won't begin to do it! This long time!Ok! Only in order that all calmed down! It I am an idiot! Because, I did mod for SH3-Stock,instead of for GWX! Forgive the villain !! It I am a cretin because because of me people can't combine these foolish "nines", with the mod GWX! I am a cretin and the idiot!! You are happy MISTER PRIVATEER?! The others all are happy?!
Enjoy yourselves!

11-16-13, 03:01 PM	#204
HW3 Navy Seal Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Gresham Oregon Posts: 6,579 Downloads: 458 Uploads: 0	How about instead of saying "fix errors of", we say "make compatible with" gentlemen? __________________ "Some ships are designed to sink...others require our assistance." Nathan Zelk

11-16-13, 01:49 PM	#197
Madox58 Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	I have no clue what you mean.

11-16-13, 01:58 PM	#198
Wise Engineer Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: St.-Petersburg Posts: 217 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	And I don't understand you. I didn't say that I want to go somewhere. I told that I am surprised by that fact that we should correct others modellers errors. What here the unclear? But, in reply you ask me, whether I want to go somewhere.

11-16-13, 02:06 PM	#199
Madox58 Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	You stated your mod was for STOCK SH3. Others wanted it for GWX so instead of changeing ID's for your mod you attack GWX Devs (ME) for mistakes? I would expect better from kovall at the very lest. (Should I remind him of WHO gave him the tools to rip SH5 models?) You obviously have no clue as to the history of Modding for SH3, where Units came from or who/why things were done in GWX. Instead you place all blame on GWX Devs that your mod does not work with GWX. How about sticking to the basic subject and stop the ignorant blame game?

11-16-13, 02:12 PM	#200
KarabekianKaleun Watch Join Date: May 2012 Location: Helsinki, Finland Posts: 26 Downloads: 167 Uploads: 0	Privateer you are too quick to judge. When I read the post it says "We made this mod for you for free on our own time and now you want us to make it work with something made by someone else and for a mod we do not use."

11-16-13, 02:15 PM	#201
Madox58 Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	That quickly devolved into placeing the blame on GWX. Not acceptable.

11-16-13, 02:35 PM	#202
Wise Engineer Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: St.-Petersburg Posts: 217 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	First, I anybody didn't attack. These are only your fabrications. People want to see these boats in GWX, but because of mistakes at creation of this global mod, there not to introduce these boats. It is necessary to correct errors which we didn't do. And it surprises me. Only and all. And to be surprised, this my right. Secondly, your cooperation with kovall, this your business. But, explain to me, what relation to given mod has your cooperation? Where you saw in this mod SH5 models? Personally I didn't use any fact of your cooperation. To me it to anything. Thirdly, my later emergence at SUBSIM forum, at all doesn't mean that I got acquainted with SH3 only yesterday. And in the fourth. If you decided to make simply scandal from scratch, I ask you, choose for this purpose somebody another. All the best.

11-16-13, 03:30 PM	#207
Madox58 Stowaway Posts: n/a Downloads: Uploads:	No. Not yet. I need those few answers to allegations posted in public. They were post in public so let's finish this.

11-16-13, 03:52 PM	#210
Wise Engineer Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: St.-Petersburg Posts: 217 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	I could confirm any told word! But, I won't begin to do it! This long time!Ok! Only in order that all calmed down! It I am an idiot! Because, I did mod for SH3-Stock,instead of for GWX! Forgive the villain !! It I am a cretin because because of me people can't combine these foolish "nines", with the mod GWX! I am a cretin and the idiot!! You are happy MISTER PRIVATEER?! The others all are happy?! Enjoy yourselves!