Obama's purge of top military brass...

Originally Posted by Aktungbby

Like I said: first year law students! Which pub in Galway any how; after this thread i'm a little dry mate!

Hughes for the pint, Tig Coili for the music

Since bubbles is still flailing away with more stuff instead of rethinking his claims in the complete absence of anything apart from hearsay of hearsay of hearsay which we can safely deduct he heard about on some loony blog.
Lets try this word game.

Roberts knows mandated fine is a penalty, a fine, not a tax, it defies the definition of what a tax is.

Run through the definitions of tax bubbles.
Post again when you have swallowed your words.

[TarJak]

Originally Posted by Tribesman

Since bubbles is still flailing away with more stuff instead of rethinking his claims in the complete absence of anything apart from hearsay of hearsay of hearsay which we can safely deduct he heard about on some loony blog.
Lets try this word game.

Run through the definitions of tax bubbles.
Post again when you have swallowed your words.

I think we should also examine Dr. Garrows history of claims:

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2013/...y-2456648.html

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/blog/?p=13046

http://www.westernjournalism.com/author/drjgarrow/

https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2013/...zionist-trail/

http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/citizens.asp

Aaaaaaand the real kicker:
http://poundpuplegacy.org/node/45036

Doctor? Doesn't look like it. other than from a box top "university" of theology.

Nobel nominee? We'll know in about 2060 when the 2010 nominations are released, but he claims someone told him he was on the list of nominees which conveniently is kept secret for 50 years after nominations are made. BTW that's secret even from the nominees. BTW anyone including Bubbles could be nominated, but it doesn't mean they've got a snowballs chance in Hell of winning one.

His "charity" is not registered as such and looks like a funding front for his Chinese child trafficking racket.

Certainly not a reliable witness for the prosecution your honour.

[Bilge_Rat]

Now you are just rubbing salt into his well flayed hide Tarjak.
That's naughty

So, after all this nonsense, it turns out that Bubblehead isn't even claiming to have any verifiable evidence that any of this is true - but he thinks it is true because it fits in with all the other things he imagines that Obama is doing but doesn't have any evidence for either...

[Tchocky]

This thread just got sad.

I mean good work, TarJak.

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Bubblehead1980

I never said they were not crimes.I said the real issue is to me it appears obama is using legal remedies to purge high ranking officers who disagree with him or if the rumors about the new litmus tests is true, give the answer he does not like.

Have any of the men removed from their posts said anything similar? You say it "appears to you" that this is so. Based on what evidence?

Something that really aggravates me about some of my detractors on this forum is that because I hold contempt for many of the laws, I somehow do not know them, how things work etc? get real.

How real? Despite fact that the charges made against Admiral McChrystal are criminal in nature you think they are unjust? You haven't been very specific about your objections to these laws. At first you dismissed the accusation as being only "for gambling". When shown that the charge of using counterfeit chips was more than just "for gambling", you tried to equate "gambling" and "poker chips" with the intent of dismissing the charge as minor. Using counterfeit poker chips is no different than using counterfeit money. Are you saying that that law deserves your contempt? Several people have been careful to point out flaws in your arguments. Rather than answer any of those points you talk about "your detractors". Everyone is still waiting for you to show any real evidence for what you claim. So far you have none.

Some laws are idiotic, ridiculous, or just outright unjust .Laws are passed by men, often time idiotic men(and women ) that have no idea what they are doing or if they do, it is for some nefarious purpose.

Again you try to dismiss the McChrystal charge, not by showing that he is innocent (which may still turn out to be the case) but by making vague claims about "some laws". Please be specific and show how laws against counterfeiting poker chips is idiotic, ridiculous or just outright unjust. Please show how the UCMJ's rule on officers criticizing their CinC are idiotic, ridiculous or just outright unjust. I'm not being a detractor at all, at least not to you personally. Your arguments, on the other hand, in my estimation deserve detraction. You've shown nothing concrete at all, yet you still insist your claims are true. They may well be, but you need to show something here.

[Mr Quatro]

How can you guys be mad at the same man that starts a thread about: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...=208393&page=4

Your favorite Star Trek movie?

He does get to you doesn't he, but look at it this way he is a reason to make sure that you are right when you counter point his claims with links. If he reads them or not I do not know, but I get a kick out of watching the horse and pony show he produces.

Without bubblehead you wouldn't have anyone to bash now would you?

You should be ashamed of yourselves and apologize to him for causing so much humor in your daily lives

Keep up the good work bubblehead just check to make sure your right next time that's all they are asking. They just want a better sparing partner

[Bilge_Rat]

OhOh...smoking gun...

[Sailor Steve]

Originally Posted by Mr Quatro

How can you guys be mad at the same man that starts a thread about...Your favorite Star Trek movie?

He also has started several good threads in the SH4 forums, and contributed to many others.

He does get to you doesn't he

Me? Not at all, nor am I mad at him. I also have nothing against him. I will debate any topic I have an interest in. In this case I take exception to someone claiming that what he says is the truth yet not being able to back it up even a little bit. Personal opinion is not fact, and believing something is not the same as knowing it.

[Mr Quatro]

Originally Posted by Bilge_Rat

OhOh...smoking gun...

or we really sure that President Obama is from Chicago?

He can fool most people in a New York minute

[mapuc]

Originally Posted by Mr Quatro

How can you guys be mad at the same man that starts a thread about: http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...=208393&page=4

Your favorite Star Trek movie?

He does get to you doesn't he, but look at it this way he is a reason to make sure that you are right when you counter point his claims with links. If he reads them or not I do not know, but I get a kick out of watching the horse and pony show he produces.

Without bubblehead you wouldn't have anyone to bash now would you?

You should be ashamed of yourselves and apologize to him for causing so much humor in your daily lives

Keep up the good work bubblehead just check to make sure your right next time that's all they are asking. They just want a better sparing partner

Sir. what's so wonderful about GT, is that in some of the threads we almost rip each others head of and in some we are great friends sharing the same interest.

Markus

[Jimbuna]

On the contrary....GT is useful because it keeps a lot of rubbish from spilling over into other areas of the forum.

[Dread Knot]

Originally Posted by Jimbuna

On the contrary....GT is useful because it keeps a lot of rubbish from spilling over into other areas of the forum.

The GT Collection Pond? If you want to play bring your Hazmat suit.