SUBSIM Radio Room Forums



SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > General > General Topics
Forget password? Reset here

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-20-13, 07:43 AM   #6
Platapus
Fleet Admiral
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 19,379
Downloads: 63
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiced_Rum View Post
If the victim was scared then he has a point. He could try the 'NRA defence', just needs to prove that he was normally a good shot down at the range and could have hit a moving target if he wanted to which could counter the attempted murder angle.
I think that would be a very hard defense to support.

I think all the prosecution needs to do is bring up the statistics of the number of people who have been killed, maimed, or injured by "blank ammunition" and the guy is going to go away for a while.

How would the defense prove that this guy was not aiming at the woman? I think there is a reasonable presumption that if someone shoots a gun at someone in anger, they intend to hit them, regardless of their actual ability to aim.

Not sure if the second degree murder charge will stick, but it sounds reasonable as an initial charge.

Does anyone know what the projectile range of a .44 mag blank round is?

We could ask Jon-Erik Hexum.
__________________
abusus non tollit usum - A right should NOT be withheld from people on the basis that some tend to abuse that right.
Platapus is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2025 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.