Syria conflict: 'Chemical attacks kill hundreds'

[mapuc]

I could be wrong(I hope I am) as I see it, it looks more and more like a crisis that becomes more and more international-an International crisis

Markus

[Mittelwaechter]

Originally Posted by mapuc

I could be wrong(I hope I am) as I see it, it looks more and more like a crisis that becomes more and more international-an International crisis

Markus

If it ever was an internal Syrian affair, it became an international one with the support of foreign countries for one or the other party. Some did it openly, others disguised.

Today we see a proxy conflict of the US led and the Russian led supporters.
This may run hot - hotter than it is - and set the region or the world on fire.

Economic interests kill people. Money rules the world.

[Alex]

Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter

Economic interests kill people. Money rules the world.

Not the Muslim world. And here I've just said everything I'm allowed to.


Looks like it's going to start all over like in 1938-45 : A world war whose first victim is going to be Syria, later to be followed by Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Algeria, Afghanistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, whose public purpose is to destroy evil/corrupt dictators, but whose real goal is to hide the stock market crash to come, foreseeable to insiders.

Just read The Psychology of Finance: Understanding the Behavioural Dynamics of Markets, by Lars Tvede. Way to understand what's taking place actually.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Alex

Looks like it's going to start all over like in 1938-45 : A world war whose first victim is going to be Syria, later to be followed by Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Algeria, Afghanistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia,

Might want to check your history.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter

He dared to try to defeat a revolt. CWs were deployed by one or the other party, but there is only one entity entitled to deploy CWs if it seems fit.

The revolt was on for... what, 2 years? WHY not attack with gas earlied if it was a plot?

Answer me that.

He is close with Iran.

So?

And iirc the Saudis are interested to run a pipeline through Syria to Europe.

Now, IIRC translates to "If I recall/remember correctly", so, you got a source for that? I'd honestly would like to see that.

[Mittelwaechter]

Originally Posted by Dowly

The revolt was on for... what, 2 years? WHY not attack with gas earlied if it was a plot?

Answer me that.

Come on Dowly, is this so hard to realize?

They were waiting, because the aggressors were on their way to overcome Assad.
Running a false flag operation is dangerous.
But the tides turned recently and Assad seems to be able to keep the control.
Now they have to justify more support for the aggressors.
So they tried in spring, but DelPonte told the world the aggressors were responsible.
This time they cared for an inspection, insisting on not to try to find the responsible party.

So?

So we are interested in kicking him out - an Iranian ally - and install a Sunni government.

Now, IIRC translates to "If I recall/remember correctly", so, you got a source for that? I'd honestly would like to see that.

There was an article I can't find anymore, emphazising the Saudi interest on the pipeline.
But a simple search and you find more information. Qatar seems to be the main profiteer in these articles.

http://www.thenational.ae/business/e...line-to-turkey

http://www.theguardian.com/environme...ergy-pipelines

I expect you to deny honestly any validity of the information...


Russia is not interested in a Syrian pipeline to Europe, so they back Assad loyally.

[tonschk]

Originally Posted by Mittelwaechter

Running a false flag operation is dangerous.

Criminal GANGSTERS took control of the US government the criminal ZIONIST ruling the US criminal government have a plan called the new american century to overthrow the government of Iraq Iran Syria Libya etc etc etc

US general WESLEY CLARK SPEAKING on 2007 exposing the crimes of the CRIMINAL zionist ruled US government .....

[Mittelwaechter]

Originally Posted by Alex

Not the Muslim world. And here I've just said everything I'm allowed to.

The church lost its political influence in the western world with the democratisation of the nations, but the aristocracy, the elites regained their power.

The Muslim world took a different course.