Syria conflict: 'Chemical attacks kill hundreds'

[Vince82]

Originally Posted by Skybird

Showing a written claim that one has evidence, and showing the evidence, are two different things.

They seem to have big problem to see that difference. Instead they want their claim taken as the evidence itself.

Unacceptable.

No circus director will make the audience laughing by just claiming that the circus has a clown. The clown has to enter the arena himself and make his jokes, there is no way around that.

Evidence, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Obama. Evidence. Either you show it, or you don't.

Mr. Kerry already did say that himself. He said this is what or findings are and this is what we got. It's no evidence, but draw your own conclussions. Some things are classified, but we will show them to your government officials.

I was reasoning the same way as the Russians did, because it's just not very smart to use chemical weapons. The Assad regime must have thought they could cover it up and maybe they felt they needed to use them in order to get the upper hand in the conflict. And maybe the temptation of using them was too great because of the effectiviness. I don't think Assad has any sort of compassion with the victims. He sees them as muslim terrorists that use chemical weapons aswell.