Time to pay the piper

[Stealhead]

Personally I do not place a higher value on a human life based on who they where or where they are from.We all know that if they had been American citizens they would not have even considered suggesting the guy get the chance of parole.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Stealhead

Personally I do not place a higher value on a human life based on who they where or where they are from.We all know that if they had been American citizens they would not have even considered suggesting the guy get the chance of parole.

Precisely.

[Rockstar]

I know some were ready to hang him without trial the moment they heard. I was of the camp not to feed him to the wolves until he had his day in court and not until all the facts of the case were in. Well it seems they're in. I said too awhile ago if he was not guilty then get him the help he needs. But if he was found guilty turn him over to the families whose relatives he murdered.

[Ducimus]

Speaking generally about the crime of murder, if the defendant is proven guilty beyond the shadow of a doubt - I am a big fan of the death penalty.

For one, the punishment should fit the crime, but for two, lets be pragmatic. Anyone guilty of such crimes is only going to be a financial burden to society because it costs money to lock him up, feed him, cloth him, tend to medical needs, etc. People guilty of capital murder are not worth the lifelong expense. Best to punish them as befitting their crime and be done with it.

As to this individual case, I'm not sure what to think. Four deployments does weigh heavily on my mind. That doesn't excuse him of his crime (nor it's punishment) , but after four combat deployments, he should not have been there anymore, at least not in a direct combat role. I feel the government does have bear some responsibility.

[BrucePartington]

After reading the article linked in OP, it seems plausible to me that his reasoning broke down out there.
He acknowledges what he did was wrong, and hints at not remembering certain things.

I have never been in combat, but in my teenage years I spent 6 years in a military boarding school. It was just terrible, I lived in terror 24h a day, specially after all teachers and military staff went home. I spent most of the time in hiding rather than studying and doing my homework.
After 3 years my reasoning broke down. I found myself doing the silliest things, having the silliest reactions.
Has anyone here ever seen the British film "If " ? http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0063850/
It was mild in comparison.
In general, older students were evil and cruel to younger students, only because "it has always been like that". Reminds me of the experiment with the monkeys and the banana inside the cage, and they all got showered every time one tried to reach for the banana.
It took me a while to recover my sanity.
Yes your reasoning breaks down after prolonged exposure to stressful situations, even more so when you live in constant fear.

[Wolferz]

For what it's worth, Ducimus, I concur.
But, Bales will serve his sentence in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. It's not the Hilton like the white collar federal pens. He'll be spending his days in misery for his drug induced mistake. Well, I should say mistakes. Sixteen of them in point of fact. What a maroon.

[Stealhead]

Well plenty of people in the current armed forces have pulled more than four deployments.Further more there is no specification the length a deployment could be anywhere from a few months to a little over a year.It just says that he did four deployments nothing more and specifies nothing further as to their length.

No matter really if he is guilty he will get what he deserves in the end.

[Ducimus]

Originally Posted by Stealhead

Well plenty of people in the current armed forces have pulled more than four deployments.

Quite true. However I think we both know that not everyone takes things the same way, or as well. Everybody is different in what they can take or how long they can take it.

Further more there is no specification the length a deployment could be anywhere from a few months to a little over a year.It just says that he did four deployments nothing more and specifies nothing further as to their length.

EXCELLENT point. For some reason, i was equating the articles use of "four deployments" in the same context as "four short tours", which is waaaayyy different. On that note, exactly how long is a typical army deployment? A short tour in the AF is usually 365 days, but I know the AF can deploy you for 179 days. They often cut a persons deployment at that point so they don't get the six month short tour credit; and often enough send them right back out again in a few days under new set of orders. (BOHICA)

No matter really if he is guilty he will get what he deserves in the end.

Yeah pretty much. I'm not supportive of the guy, but what I meant to say is that if there was a systemic failure in whatever system the Army has in place, that allowed a guy who probably should have been sent to the psych ward at walter reed instead of another deployment, then it should probably be looked at. I mean, **** man, there's a reason why the AF started it's Expeditionary system. To give people a freaking break due to "operational tempo". They started that system just after I left active duty, and in my line of work, we had people deployed 200+ days out of the year.

[Dowly]

Originally Posted by Stealhead

It just says that he did four deployments nothing more and specifies nothing further as to their length.

Twelve months in 2003-2004, fifteen months in 2006-2007 and ten months in 2009-2010, according to wikipedia.

[Wolferz]

Four deployments?!?! Now I know the brass are out of their freaking minds!

They, the brass, put this ticking time bomb over there to go off when least expected, like an IED. Now the question in my mind is, were all of these tours voluntary or mandatory? Even the Viet Nam debacle only carried a mandatory one tour and home. This guy should have been posted at home in a training command after two tours.